2014
DOI: 10.1108/jocm-06-2013-0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same?

Abstract: Purpose – This study aims to examine workers' distributive and interactional justice perceptions at three different moments in time over a period of eight years, assess their degree of stability and identify their most stable antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Data was collected through an overlapping repeated cross-sectional design. Of the participants involved, 334 were surveyed in 2000, 259 participated in 2004, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributional justice can protect employees' personal interests, mainly manifested in the fact that employees can determine how much work they invest in according to established distribution principles. Long-term deviations in their attitudes towards the company may lead to psychological imbalances and a decline in work passion, which are not conducive to stimulating innovation behaviours (Altuna et al, 2015;Rita Silva and Caetano, 2014). Interactional justice can better reflect the emotional evaluation and justice perception of the members in the organisation to the superior managers.…”
Section: Test Of Moderating Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributional justice can protect employees' personal interests, mainly manifested in the fact that employees can determine how much work they invest in according to established distribution principles. Long-term deviations in their attitudes towards the company may lead to psychological imbalances and a decline in work passion, which are not conducive to stimulating innovation behaviours (Altuna et al, 2015;Rita Silva and Caetano, 2014). Interactional justice can better reflect the emotional evaluation and justice perception of the members in the organisation to the superior managers.…”
Section: Test Of Moderating Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the ways in which organizations help leaders to obtain acceptance is by developing and implementing a proper distributive system. Nasurdin and Khuan (2011) and Silva and Caetano (2014) have focused on the positive impact of DJ on employees' trust in their leaders. Leaders help in communicating a positive image of organization with employees (Naqshbandi, Kaur, Sehgal, & Subramaniam, 2015).…”
Section: Dj and Trust In Leadermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is easier for leaders to obtain employees' acceptance (Hyllengren et al, 2011). Employees know that their leader's pay mechanisms are in line with the pay policy of the organization (Silva & Caetano, 2014).…”
Section: Dj and Trust In Leadermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, research on the organizational commitment of contemporary Generation Y workers in the Malaysian FMCG business is considered necessary. This research aims to determine if organizational justice, job happiness, and work-life balance have an effect on the commitment of Generation Y employees to their present FMCG companies (Heidarzadeh Hanzaee & Esmaeilpour, 2017; M. R. Silva & Caetano, 2014). In addition, the purpose of this research is to investigate whether there is a substantial difference between certain personal traits and the organizational commitment of Generation Y workers in the FMCG business.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%