Organizational interventions for promoting person-centred care for people with dementia

Dichter, Martin N.; Reuther, Sven; Trutschel, Diana; Köpke, Sascha; Halek, Margareta

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013375

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although from the above discussion appears that SDM would be most suitable for decision-competent patients, the practice of PCC seems to regard patients with significant cognitive decline, such as patients with dementia (e.g. [13,16]. In PCC this decision incompetency is resolved by the inclusion of other people, such as adult children of demented elderly people.…”

Section: Boundaries Within Which Pcc and Sdm Brings Benefits To Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared Decision Making

Marinković

Rogers

Lewandowski

et al. 2022

Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Person-Centered Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section introduces the concept and models of shared decision-making as a framework of person-centered care. The second section focuses on multicriteria decision-making techniques in healthcare settings and literature review about multicriteria decision making analysis methods used in healthcare is presented. The third section introduces the ethical and practical considerations about shared decision-making in person-centered care. In this section, the patient narratives are included, as well as the barriers to implementation.

show abstract

Section: Boundaries Within Which Pcc and Sdm Brings Benefits To Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared Decision Making

Marinković

Rogers

Lewandowski

et al. 2022

Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Person-Centered Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this reason, some organisational conditions are necessary, e.g., PCC skills training for health professionals and creating a person-centred culture and environment. It is essential, that the organisation (e.g., the nursing home) creates conditions to enable person-centredness [11]. It becomes clear, that the implementation of PCC is very complex and this change process is time consuming [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the German language Person-centred climate questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-G-S): a cross-sectional study

Wilfling

Mohler

Berg

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Person-centredness is considered as best practice for people with dementia. A frequently used instrument to assess person-centredness of a care environment is the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ). The questionnaire comprises of 14 items with the three subscales a climate of safety, a climate of everydayness and a climate of community. Aim The aim of the study is to describe the translation process of the English language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire (Staff version, Patient version, Family version) into German language (PCQ-G) and to evaluate the first psychometric properties of the German language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire– Staff version (PCQ-G-S). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study. The three versions of the 14-item English PCQ were translated into German language (PCQ-G) based on the recommendations for cross-cultural adaption of measures. Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the questionnaire were assessed among nursing home staff (PCQ-G-S). Item distribution was calculated using descriptive statistics. Structural validity was tested using principal component analysis (PCA), and internal consistency was assessed for the resulting subscales using Cronbach’s alpha. Data collection took place from May to September 2021. Results A total sample of 120 nurses was included in the data analysis. Nine out of 14 items of the PCQ-G-S demonstrated acceptable item difficulty, while five times showed a ceiling effect. The PCA analysis demonstrated a strong structural validity for a three-factor solution explaining 68.6% of the total variance. The three subscales demonstrated a strong internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha scores of 0.8 for each of the subscales. Conclusion The analysis of the 14-item German version (PCQ-G-S) showed first evidence for a strong internal consistency and structural validity for evaluating staff perceptions of the person-centredness in German nursing homes. Based on this, further investigations for scale validity of the PCQ-G versions should be carried out.

show abstract