2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
430
2
53

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 663 publications
(574 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
27
430
2
53
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, quality data are considered to be important organizational resources or assets (Chae et al 2013;Redman 1995), impacting organizational performance (Forslund et al 2007;Gorla et al 2010). Poor data quality is costly, having consequences on decision making and operation (Redman 1998).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, quality data are considered to be important organizational resources or assets (Chae et al 2013;Redman 1995), impacting organizational performance (Forslund et al 2007;Gorla et al 2010). Poor data quality is costly, having consequences on decision making and operation (Redman 1998).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dimension includes the overall quality of services that a particular Information System (IS) provides to an organisation [69]. According to Gorla and Wong [70], service quality is positively associated with organizational impact.…”
Section: Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information content determines the value of the information displayed to the system user in the report or inquiry screens and the precision and completeness of the information [43]. System users should be provided with the appropriate content that facilitates their work, and they have to access the content easily by using friendly search tools [33].…”
Section: H1: User Satisfaction Is Positively Influenced By E-procuremmentioning
confidence: 99%