2017
DOI: 10.1108/s2056-375220170000003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Identity of Universities: A Review of the Literature from 1972 to 2014

Abstract: Organizational identity provides an increasingly large number of researchers with a theoretical lens for examining current transformations of the university. The primary objective of this article is to propose an extensive, systematic overview of the literature published on the subject between 1972 and 2014. The analysis of 120 empirical studies reveals a literature which is rich but dispersed, in theoretical, epistemological and methodological terms alike; thriving since the 2000s, it is mainly US but increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend in commercialisation was found in American (Dumay et al, 2017; Saichaie, 2011), Danish (Svendsen and Svendsen, 2018), Singaporean (Ng, 2014), Malaysian (Osman, 2008), Chinese (Teo and Ren, 2019; Zhang, 2017), Ghanaian (Akoto, 2018), Russian (Kozyreva, 2016), Peruvian (Manky and Dolores, 2021), and Pakistani (Shahnaz, 2022) universities. Despite vast research having been conducted on this topic, no study has focused on Central Asian universities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar trend in commercialisation was found in American (Dumay et al, 2017; Saichaie, 2011), Danish (Svendsen and Svendsen, 2018), Singaporean (Ng, 2014), Malaysian (Osman, 2008), Chinese (Teo and Ren, 2019; Zhang, 2017), Ghanaian (Akoto, 2018), Russian (Kozyreva, 2016), Peruvian (Manky and Dolores, 2021), and Pakistani (Shahnaz, 2022) universities. Despite vast research having been conducted on this topic, no study has focused on Central Asian universities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, universities compete for attention and they create a discourse of 'a battle for students' (Social Market Foundation, 2021). Consequently, many studies have demonstrated that tuition-based universities are becoming market-oriented (Askehave, 2007;Dumay et al, 2017;Mautner, 2005;Mulderrig, 2003;Ng, 2014;Saichaie, 2011), although the university discourse has been criticised for its market-oriented ways (Fairclough, 1993(Fairclough, , 2000Fairclough and Fairclough, 2018). All these studies pertain to developed countries like the USA, UK, Australia, China and Singapore; little information can be traced concerning the university discourse in developing countries of Central Asia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, also, that there are a number of approaches in the literature mentioned in [9] that use similar ideas to the ones used in the approach based on structural coupling. To these, for instance, belong the Stakeholders approach [22], and Institutional logic [23].…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organization in the focus of our case study is an institution of the higher education, more exactly, a department of a university. Among the previous works related to organizational identity, there are many that are devoted to identity of a university; for instance, a literature review [9] considers 120 peer reviewed publications in this area. However, as with general literature related to identity concept, none of them suggests a system theoretical model that can be used for understanding and managing identity of the institution of higher education, such as a department, school, or faculty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OID and organizational identity have widely been attracted to more research interests to understand organizations and their interactions with the environment (He and Brown, 2013). Although growing numbers of studies are using the concept of organizational identity and identification to understand the current transformations of the university (Dumay et al , 2015; Stensaker, 2015), there are still considerable scopes for further advances and these offer opportunities for developing organizational identity and identification studies. For example, what is the relationship between Professors' OID with the ORTC and OINN of a university?…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%