2020
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.3086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Identity of Think Tank(er)s: A Growing Elite Group in Swedish Civil Society

Abstract: Think tanks, defined as organizations that produce policy research for political purposes (McGann, 2007; Medvetz, 2008), are an increasingly ubiquitous type of policy actor world-wide. In Sweden, the last 20 years’ sharp increase in think tank numbers (Åberg, Einarsson, & Reuter, 2019) has coincided with the decline of the traditional Swedish corporatist model based on the intimate involvement of the so-called ‘popular movements’ in policy-making (Lundberg, 2014; Micheletti, 1995). Contrary to the larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a limited number of professionalized and resourceful NgOs can play such a role vis-à-vis political and economic leaders, including resourceful and widely recognized think-tanks, internationally connected foundations, and large associations. 25 The privileged position of such organizations not only reflects (and in effect strengthens) significant inequalities regarding power, resources, and voice in the third sector, but also shows that the boundaries between civil society and the field of politics are porous. The blurred boundaries between different fields may lead not only to increased cooperation between the representatives of the two fields but also to conflict and competition.…”
Section: Linking Elite Theory and Civil Society Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a limited number of professionalized and resourceful NgOs can play such a role vis-à-vis political and economic leaders, including resourceful and widely recognized think-tanks, internationally connected foundations, and large associations. 25 The privileged position of such organizations not only reflects (and in effect strengthens) significant inequalities regarding power, resources, and voice in the third sector, but also shows that the boundaries between civil society and the field of politics are porous. The blurred boundaries between different fields may lead not only to increased cooperation between the representatives of the two fields but also to conflict and competition.…”
Section: Linking Elite Theory and Civil Society Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many fundamental works have been published on the think tank sector and its various issues which have been of great importance in terms of further development and conceptualization of academic discourse in this sphere. Among them are for example valuable publications of Andrew Denham 4 , Andrew Rich 5 , Andrew Selee 6 , Alexander Sungurov 7 , Diane Stone 8 , Donald E. Abelson 9 , Enrique Mendizabal 10 , Hartwig Pautz 11 , James A. Smith 12 , James G. McGann 13 , Jordan Tchilingirian 14 , Mahmood Ahmad 15 , Md.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes of elitisation take place in formal CSOs, such as NGOs, and more informal networks and platforms, as demonstrated in the Cambodian case (Norén-Nilsson & Eng, 2020). A particular type of civil society elites can be found among think tanks, although they do not necessarily self-identify as belonging to the civil society field, as shown in articles by Åberg, Einarsson, and Reuter (2020) and by Jezierska (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%