Organizational Hashtags During Times of Crisis: Analyzing the Broadcasting and Gatekeeping Dynamics of #PorteOuverte During the November 2015 Paris Terror Attacks

Abstract

Twitter hashtags allow citizens to share vital information and make sense of acute crisis events such as terrorist attacks. They also enable those watching from afar to express their sympathy and solidarity with the victims. Perhaps the most well known of these has been #PorteOuverte (translated into English as “Open Door”), first used during the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris before re-emerging during subsequent atrocities in Brussels (March 2016) and Nice (July 2016). The hashtag was originally created by journalist Sylvain Lapoix in order to connect those in Paris looking for somewhere to stay with those able to offer them refuge, before reaching an international audience courtesy of its amplification by public figures and citizens based overseas. This article adds to this emergent literature by analyzing the networked gatekeeping dynamics of #PorteOuverte during the Paris terror attacks. It does so by reviewing the literature on Twitter hashtags and acute crisis events, exploring how Twitter was used during the Paris terror attacks, and presenting the results of a Social Network Analysis (SNA) of 399,256 #PorteOuverte tweets posted as the attacks unfolded on 13 November 2015. Results indicate that professional journalists were key broadcasters during four identified peaks within #PorteOuverte, helping to promote the informational hashtag and connect those directly affected. However, citizens and bloggers played an increasingly important gatekeeping function in the aftermath of events such as the Bataclan siege in Paris.

The Pandemic across Platform Societies: Weibo and Twitter at the Outbreak of the Covid-19 Epidemic in China and the West

“…Finally, we used repost/retweet network mapping to investigate gatekeeping dynamics (RQ3). This is a technique commonly used to identify prominent users in social media interactions (see Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2015Meraz & Papacharissi, 2013;Reilly & Vicari, 2021;Vicari, 2017). All the network visualizations presented in this paper were produced with Gephi 0.9.2, a network analysis and visualization software.…”

“…The focus of these studies is often on discursive dynamics developing on Twitter around the use of issue or activist hashtags (Papacharissi, 2015;Rambukkana, 2015). In more specific terms, research has shown that Twitter's socio-technical infrastructure -especially its affordances enabling bottom-up curation practices -has allowed the coming to prominence of actors who have been traditionally defined as 'non-elite' , namely ordinary users ( Hermida, 2015;Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2015Meraz & Papacharissi, 2013;Reilly & Vicari, 2021;Vicari, 2017;Vicari et al, 2020). These dynamics have then brought changes to traditional gatekeeping practices, with citizens often becoming primary sources of information, or gatekeepers, for both traditional non-elites (i.e.…”

Hashtag publics, networked framing and the July 2016 'coup' in Turkey

“…This illustrates how hashtags capture the attention of tweeters in such a way as that aids the mobilisation of support for social movements and advocacy campaigns (Xiong, et al, 2019). Research indicates that hashtags can be extremely effective in presencing specific narratives, which are often curated by non-elite actors (Meraz and Papacharissi, 2013;Jackson and Foucault Welles, 2016;Vicari, 2017;Reilly and Vicari, 2021).…”

Networked Gatekeeping in ‘Twitter’ During a Crisis Event: A Case Study of #Taksim in Türkiye

“…Researchers have explored the use of hashtags during emergency situations, such as terrorist attacks (Burnap et al, 2014;Steensen, 2018;Tikka, 2019;Reilly & Vicari, 2021) and natural disasters (Bruns & Burgess, 2014;Pourebrahim et al, 2019). For example, Burnap and colleagues (2014) examined Twitter communication during a terrorist attack in Woolwich in 2013.…”