Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework.MethodsWe used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance).ResultsThe results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment.ConclusionsThe primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management.

Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self‐management behaviour in chronic conditions

“…Interventions aimed at changing the behaviour of clinicians have had limited success (Post et al . , Vollmar et al . ).…”

“…Interventions aimed at changing the behaviour of clinicians have had limited success (Post et al 2009, Vollmar et al 2010. There is an assumption that rationalistic approaches to behaviour change, such as encouraging uptake of clinical guidelines, are self-evidently adopted in practice (Sackett et al 2000).…”

Determinants of Readiness for Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) in the VA Health Care System

“…Collaborative care models, such as TIDES 31,32 or BHL, [33][34][35] are highly evidence-based in terms of effectiveness. However, they require significant system redesign and training, [36][37][38] with or without the addition of collocation. Collocation alone, on the other hand, requires little system redesign.…”

A Qualitative Study on Incentives and Disincentives for Care of Common Mental Disorders in Ontario Family Health Teams

“…Despite payment models helping facilitate scheduling and appointment bookings, the FHTs' model's innovative payment model appears to be problematic for patients with CMDs. Financial incentives that are inclusive of various health conditions but exclude mental health can deter treatment for CMDs (Post et al 2009). Disincentives exist in physician payment models that deter care for patients with complexity or CMDs, because they are believed to require more services than patients who are healthier (MOHLTC 2014; Sherman et al 2010).…”