1975
DOI: 10.2307/974548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Design: A Post Minnowbrook Perspective for the "New" Public Administration

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external environment of a public organization is littered with political considerations. The views of opinion leaders, outright manipulation by legislators and interest groups, and opposition to an agency's prerogatives are more important than economic issues, which are crucial for private organizations (Levine et al 1975). Disagreements, reciprocity, and quid pro quos can occur at any time and, within limits, are permissible ingredients in public decisions.…”
Section: Authority Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external environment of a public organization is littered with political considerations. The views of opinion leaders, outright manipulation by legislators and interest groups, and opposition to an agency's prerogatives are more important than economic issues, which are crucial for private organizations (Levine et al 1975). Disagreements, reciprocity, and quid pro quos can occur at any time and, within limits, are permissible ingredients in public decisions.…”
Section: Authority Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promise and perils of design also suffuse basic tensions in the study of public administration (Levine et al 1975). Practitioners who criticize the limited real-world relevance of scholarship are often frustrated by the lack of clear design prescriptions: what should we do?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership may best be understood as problem solving in which the activities of a collectivity are directed by an individual toward the resolution of a perceived performance gap, i.e., a disparity between an actual and a preferred state of affairs (Levine, et al, 1975). Performance gaps or problems confronting organizations and leaders tend to fall into three categories: (1) those stemming from internal states of an organization; (2) those stemming from relations between an organization and its immediate or proximal environment; and (3) those involving relations between an organization and its remote or distal environment.…”
Section: Leadership Theory and The Levels Of Analysis Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%