2016
DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2016.748.753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Culture from an Internal and External Stakeholders’ Perspective

Abstract: A culture change within an organization may be of importance in this turbulent world. An assessment of the current and desired cultural profiles can help estimate as to whether any changes are required. In this study the organizational culture of a housing association was examined from both the staff's and external stakeholders' perspectives. How does the current culture compare with the desired culture? Do the external stakeholders perceive the organization's culture in a similar way? Do the staff's and exter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of this type of support and particularly leadership from managers and understanding from colleagues, was arguably, a significant factor in the lower level of programme adoption in Site 2. Indeed, these findings are consistent with previous research which links organisational factors, such as leadership and organisational climate, to more positive perceptions of, and attitudes toward, evidence-based programmes (Aarons, Ehrhart, Farahnak & Sklar, 2014;Brimhall et al, 2016;Jungnitsch, Stoffers & Neessen, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Synthesissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The lack of this type of support and particularly leadership from managers and understanding from colleagues, was arguably, a significant factor in the lower level of programme adoption in Site 2. Indeed, these findings are consistent with previous research which links organisational factors, such as leadership and organisational climate, to more positive perceptions of, and attitudes toward, evidence-based programmes (Aarons, Ehrhart, Farahnak & Sklar, 2014;Brimhall et al, 2016;Jungnitsch, Stoffers & Neessen, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Synthesissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Total equals 100 points for each question. By completing the instrument in all six questions, it is possible to provide a picture of how organization operates and the values that characterize it (Jungnitsch et al, 2016;Schmidtová and Vacek, 2013). No right or wrong answers exist for these questions just as there is not right or wrong culture (Cameron and Quinn, 1999; , then H 0 is rejected in favour of H 1 , which means that there are statistically significant differences between the distributions of Slovak and German respondents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%