2018
DOI: 10.1177/0170840617752748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Creativity, Play and Entrepreneurship: Introduction and Framing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the experienced indeterminacy of the future, debates on digital transformation are partly interwoven with ‘new forms of organizing’ (Schreyögg & Sydow, 2010) as potentially digital alternatives to more formal, bureaucratic and planning-based ways of engaging with the future. Partly under the label ‘future of work’ (Gratton, 2014), these forms of organizing position entrepreneurship and creativity at the heart of ‘the new normal [of] organizational life’ (Hjorth, Strati, Drakopoulou Dodd, & Weik, 2018, p. 165). Accordingly, new forms of organizing promise to apply less conventional and, perhaps, more artistic and artisan practices of producing and enacting the future, such as improvisation (Weick, 1998), craft work (Bell & Vachhani, 2019), play (Hjorth, 2005) and theatrical performances (Schreyögg & Höpfl, 2004), all of which deserve greater attention in organization studies.…”
Section: The Future As a Problem In Organizations: Toward An Understamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the experienced indeterminacy of the future, debates on digital transformation are partly interwoven with ‘new forms of organizing’ (Schreyögg & Sydow, 2010) as potentially digital alternatives to more formal, bureaucratic and planning-based ways of engaging with the future. Partly under the label ‘future of work’ (Gratton, 2014), these forms of organizing position entrepreneurship and creativity at the heart of ‘the new normal [of] organizational life’ (Hjorth, Strati, Drakopoulou Dodd, & Weik, 2018, p. 165). Accordingly, new forms of organizing promise to apply less conventional and, perhaps, more artistic and artisan practices of producing and enacting the future, such as improvisation (Weick, 1998), craft work (Bell & Vachhani, 2019), play (Hjorth, 2005) and theatrical performances (Schreyögg & Höpfl, 2004), all of which deserve greater attention in organization studies.…”
Section: The Future As a Problem In Organizations: Toward An Understamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situated "managing responsibly" is therefore grounded in a post-humanist theorization on practice (Braidotti, 2013;Diprose, 2009;Gherardi, 2017, Strati, 2019 that enhances the aesthetic dimension of the organizational life by focusing on the aesthetic materiality of the situated organizational experiences (Gherardi & Strati, 2012), on embodied ethics in organizational life (Pullen & Rhodes, 2014) and aesthetics of virtue (Hancock, 2008), and on organizational creativity, play and entrepreneurship (Hjorth et al, 2018).…”
Section: Beauty Of Responsible Management: the Lens And Methodology Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, recent organizational research (De Cock et al, 2013; Komporozos-Athanasiou and Fotaki, 2015: 335) has pointed out that today we are facing a ‘crisis of imagination’ in the contexts of organization, economy and society, and that there is need to explore imaginative modes of participating in organizations. While there has been a broad paradigmatic shift towards ‘creativity’ and ‘innovation’ in organization and management studies, this shift has been criticized for its instrumental and often unpolitical nature (Hjorth et al, 2018). The notion of imagination seems, in this regard, to provide a remedy.…”
Section: Re-imagining Management Education Through the Dérivementioning
confidence: 99%