Organizational climate and organizational politics: understanding the role of employees using parallel mediation

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to inspect the influence of organizational climate on the social desirability of political behaviour of employees. It also examines perception of politics and perceived behavioural choice as the underlying mechanisms that mediate the relationship between organizational climate and social desirability of political tactics. Finally, the paper studies the influence of desirability of politics on frequency of use of political tactics.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data (n = 234) collected from a large public sector organization in India. The inter-relationships are tested empirically using structural equation modelling.FindingsThe findings suggest that organizational climate significantly influences the social desirability of political tactics such that positive climate leads to lower social desirability of political tactics. Also, perception of politics and perceived behavioural choice mediate the relationship between organizational climate and desirability of political tactics. Finally, the social desirability of political tactics positively and significantly influences frequency of political tactics used.Research limitations/implicationsBecause of the nature of the study, generalization must be made with caution since it has been conducted in an Indian public sector organization, and errors due to measurement method could be present. The study provides a better understanding of the relationship between organizational climate and political behaviour and clarifies the mediating role of perception of politics and behavioural choices. It also elucidates the need for organizations to accept the active role of employees in determining the nature of workplace politics.Originality/valueThe study establishes political perceptions and perceived behavioural choice as important mediators between climate and political behaviour, fostering in-depth research into the environmental aspects of public sector organizations. It also establishes employees as autonomous members of the organization who make political choices by taking into account their organizational contexts, a concept much newer to highly formalized and codified public sector organizations.

The Role of Grit in Organizational Performance During a Pandemic

“…A supportive climate is defined as how members trust, care for, and collaborate with one another, and it is an important type of psychological climate in the organization (Kim et al, 2021 ). The study created a supportive climate by focusing on desirable outcomes, such as performance, job satisfaction, and commitment, and demonstrating construct validity (Rogg et al, 2001 ; Tripathi and Tripathi, 2022 ).…”

Organizational Climate Scale for Public Service: Development and Validation

“…Moreover, it serves as an important management tool. In this regard, the scale will enable the investigation of inter-and intra-organizational issues in various public agencies (Tripathi and Tripathi 2022), fostering new approaches.…”

The personal initiative paradox: why benevolent political will decreases career growth prospects in a political environment?

“…They may well interpret such otherwise other-benefitting behaviour of personal initiative as emanating from the political will of individuals, albeit benevolent (Parker et al, 2019). If the organizational environment remains riddled with mistrust, perceptions of organizational politics will also increase (Hochwarter et al, 2020;Tripathi and Tripathi, 2022). In such a "political" atmosphere, supervisors' assessment of subordinates' career growth prospects might become negative under a higher level of perceived organizational politics.…”

“…If the organizational environment remains riddled with mistrust, perceptions of organizational politics will also increase (Hochwarter et al. , 2020; Tripathi and Tripathi, 2022). In such a “political” atmosphere, supervisors' assessment of subordinates' career growth prospects might become negative under a higher level of perceived organizational politics.…”