Abstract:The purpose of this study was to determine the direct and indirect influence POS and extraversion personality to OCB and affective commitment as mediation. The population in this research that all employees Aneka Jaya Supermarket Sambiroto number of 126 employees. Mechanical sampling using saturated sample so that the entire population of the research sample. Methods of data collection using a questionnaire with a Likert scale of 1-5. Data analysis method is test instrument (validity and reliability), a descri… Show more
“…This means that for every unit of Environment, Organizational Citizenship Behavior will increase by 0.235 units through Organizational Commitment. These results align with research showing an indirect effect of the environment on organisational citizenship behaviour through organisational commitment [20,45,46,47]. There is an indirect effect of Environment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour through Organizational Commitment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 4 shows that Military leadership has no significant effect on Organizational Commitment, with a significance of 0.467 greater than 0.05. This result does not align with [18,19,20,21], which shows that leadership influences organisational commitment.…”
This research delves into the analysis of various factors affecting the organisational citizenship behaviour of First Officers within Koarmada-I. Specifically, the study explores the impact of trust, leadership, environment, and organisational commitment on this behaviour. The research sample consists of 143 First Officers based in Jakarta's Koarmada-I. The study uses descriptive analysis, validity and reliability tests, and Structural Equation Modeling for hypothesis testing. The study findings indicate that trust significantly impacts Organizational Commitment, whereas its effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior is not statistically significant. Military leadership, on the other hand, does not demonstrate a substantial influence on Organizational Commitment, but it does have a considerable effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
“…This means that for every unit of Environment, Organizational Citizenship Behavior will increase by 0.235 units through Organizational Commitment. These results align with research showing an indirect effect of the environment on organisational citizenship behaviour through organisational commitment [20,45,46,47]. There is an indirect effect of Environment on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour through Organizational Commitment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 4 shows that Military leadership has no significant effect on Organizational Commitment, with a significance of 0.467 greater than 0.05. This result does not align with [18,19,20,21], which shows that leadership influences organisational commitment.…”
This research delves into the analysis of various factors affecting the organisational citizenship behaviour of First Officers within Koarmada-I. Specifically, the study explores the impact of trust, leadership, environment, and organisational commitment on this behaviour. The research sample consists of 143 First Officers based in Jakarta's Koarmada-I. The study uses descriptive analysis, validity and reliability tests, and Structural Equation Modeling for hypothesis testing. The study findings indicate that trust significantly impacts Organizational Commitment, whereas its effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior is not statistically significant. Military leadership, on the other hand, does not demonstrate a substantial influence on Organizational Commitment, but it does have a considerable effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.