Organizational buying decision approaches in manufacturing industry: developing measures and typology

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore buying decision factors and approaches of companies operating in manufacturing industry in Croatia. Design/methodology/approach The data collected by company survey were analysed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, cluster analysis and cross-tabulation analysis. Findings Results show that manufacturers are influenced by six distinctive factors when making purchasing decisions. These are supplier’s flexibility, supplier’s reliability, interdepartmental communication, top management support, routine purchases and buyer’s price sensitivity. Manufacturers can be classified in four different groups according to their buying decision-making patterns. Practical implications This paper provides a set of factors and approaches which might help selling companies and sales representatives understand the purchasing practices of buying company better, and develop adaptive selling approaches accordingly. Originality/value Based on a literature review and field research, an instrument of organizational buying behaviour was developed and tested in the Croatian manufacturing industry. The factors of organizational buying behaviour patterns were identified, and the typology of buying decision approaches applicable for manufacturing industry was developed.

An Analytical Study of Critical Factors Affecting Contractor Efficiency in Construction Projects in Indian Scenario

“…Evidently, all the delay-causing factors originated either from the following: consultant's influence, contractor's issues, design changes, equipment related, external factors, human resources, material constraints, non-cooperation from principal or project complexities (Eriksson, 2010;Wang et al, 2015;Doğan et al, 2016;Sinčić Ćorić et al, 2017). A probable explanation of this is every actor is trying to blame others for delays.…”

What are Important Technologies for Sustainable Development in the Trucking Industries of Emerging Markets? Differences between Organizational and Individual Buyers

“…Subsequently, Webster and Wind [33] identified five buying roles within the context of these buying centers: users, influencers, buyers, deciders, and gatekeepers. Organizational buying behavior is, thus, regarded as a process [17,22,[34][35][36][37] consisting of a series of complex and interdependent activities [17], such as requirements, technical specifications, supplier evaluations, and final purchase decisions [36]. The specific decision stages and roles in organizational buying may vary across buying situations.…”

“…Many scholars since have expanded on this research [16,17,22,24,38]. Sheth [34] considered the influence of information factors and psychological factors on organizational buying behavior.…”

“…The theoretical contributions of this study include: (1) This study expands and enriches the application of organizational buying behavior theory into high environmental uncertainty [20,21] and into an emerging market setting [17,[22][23][24]. (2) This study enriches the empirical application of the transaction cost economics in the trucking industry [25][26][27][28].…”

“…With the advancement and sustainable innovation of technology, the environment in which organizations make purchases is constantly developing [16]. Buying behavior is a complex and dynamic issue that is subject to many complex environmental factors, such as sustainable economic development goals, raw material with low carbon and environmental protection supply, competition, and technological changes in sustainability [17]. The demand for technologies for sustainability may also vary with ownership structure: Common carriers (organizational buyers), who use employee drivers, may be more concerned with after-sale service packages and driver training, which may dramatically reduce their operation costs, while owner-operators (i.e., individual buyers) may be primarily concerned with the quality, durability, and resale value of trucks because of their liability exposure and limited access to capital.…”