2019
DOI: 10.3390/languages5010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational and Formational Structures of Networks in the Mental Lexicon: A State-Of-The-Art through Systematic Review

Abstract: This state-of-the-art presents a systematic exploration on the use of network patterns in global research efforts to understand, organize and represent the mental lexicon. Results have shown an increase over recent years in the usage of complex, small-world and scale-free network patterns within the literature. With the increasing complexity of network patterns, we see more potential in the inter-disciplinary exploration of the mental lexicon through universal and mathematically-describable, behavioral pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this point of view, our results are consistent with previous research that strongly associates word frequency as a metric for estimating word difficulty (Leroy & Kauchack, 2014), highlighting the influence of word frequency on reading comprehension (Chen & Meurers, 2016). Consequently, students' individual differences, with regard to the quality of their lexical representations, affect lexical precision in both lexical access and reading comprehension (Andrews & Hersch, 2010;Andrews & Lo, 2012;Andrews et al, 2020;Hersch & Andrews, 2012) as links between the nodes of the mental lexicon result in higher network connectivity for high-frequency words (McCarthy & Miralpeix, 2020;Steyvers & Tenenbaum, 2005), while low-frequency words have fewer connections (Hills et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this point of view, our results are consistent with previous research that strongly associates word frequency as a metric for estimating word difficulty (Leroy & Kauchack, 2014), highlighting the influence of word frequency on reading comprehension (Chen & Meurers, 2016). Consequently, students' individual differences, with regard to the quality of their lexical representations, affect lexical precision in both lexical access and reading comprehension (Andrews & Hersch, 2010;Andrews & Lo, 2012;Andrews et al, 2020;Hersch & Andrews, 2012) as links between the nodes of the mental lexicon result in higher network connectivity for high-frequency words (McCarthy & Miralpeix, 2020;Steyvers & Tenenbaum, 2005), while low-frequency words have fewer connections (Hills et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consequently, the four main features of a high-frequency word's identity (phonology, orthography, morphology, and meaning) are easily retrieved from the mental lexicon (Vonk et al, 2019), "the mental system which includes all the information a person knows about words" (Richards & Schmidt, 2010, p. 339). This suggests that word frequency, amongst other linguistic properties, influences the organization and the links between nodes of the mental lexicon, resulting in higher network connectivity for high-frequency words (McCarthy & Miralpeix, 2020;Steyvers & Tenenbaum, 2005;), whereas low-frequency words have fewer connections (Hills et al, 2009).…”
Section: Assessing the Constituents Of A Word's Form Based On The Fra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, network models have been developed and widely applied in understanding the organization of the mental lexicon. Small-world scale-free complex network, one of the major types of network model, enables us to explore the organizational features of the mental lexicon at different levels, including macroscopic, mesoscopic, and microscopic levels 31 . Macroscopic properties characterize the global organization, mesoscopic properties describe the subsets of nodes and word meanings, and microscopic properties focus on the connections of a single node to the rest of the network 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%