1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization of cerebral cortico-olivary projections in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, it was concluded that the projection from motor cortex to olive in rats is mainly (if not exclusively) an indirect one. This, however, contrasts with the findings of Swenson et al (1989) who also used anterograde tracing methods in rats and identified a substantial direct ipsilateral olivary projection arising from regions of the motor cortex. A possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is that in the study by Ackerley et al (2006), tracer injections were made into the motor cortex where microstimulation usually evoked whole forearm or lower limb movements.…”
Section: Cerebro-olivocerebellar Pathwayscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, it was concluded that the projection from motor cortex to olive in rats is mainly (if not exclusively) an indirect one. This, however, contrasts with the findings of Swenson et al (1989) who also used anterograde tracing methods in rats and identified a substantial direct ipsilateral olivary projection arising from regions of the motor cortex. A possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is that in the study by Ackerley et al (2006), tracer injections were made into the motor cortex where microstimulation usually evoked whole forearm or lower limb movements.…”
Section: Cerebro-olivocerebellar Pathwayscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…A possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is that in the study by Ackerley et al (2006), tracer injections were made into the motor cortex where microstimulation usually evoked whole forearm or lower limb movements. By contrast, in the study by Swenson et al (1989), tracer injections were made into regions of motor cortex where microstimulation elicited distal movements. This raises the possibility that control of multijoint limb movements (at least in rats) requires a preolivary relay, while control of distal movements may require a direct cerebro-olivary link.…”
Section: Cerebro-olivocerebellar Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is of interest that these areas are also the recipients of cerebellar input as has been demonstrated in the cat (Bull and Berkley, 1991). The IOD also receives a direct and somatotopically organized input from the somatosensory and dysgranular cortices (Swenson et al, 1989;Lee and Kim, 2012). In the rat it has been shown that the anterior interposed nucleus (IntA) of the cerebellum III.…”
Section: Afferents To the Dorsal Accessory Olivementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The homology between the situation in the cat and that in the rat has not yet been specifically investigated (see also the section below "Afferents to the principal olivary nucleus"). Direct input to the IOM has been described to originate from the sensory and supplementary motorcortices (Swenson et al, 1989;Lee and Kim, 2012). Prominent GABAergic projections arise from the contralateral IntP Fredette and Mugnaini, 1991).…”
Section: Afferents To the Medial Accessory Olivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracing (Swenson et al, 1989) and electrophysiological studies in rats show that they also receive inputs from the whisker sensory cortex (Brown and Bower, 2002). …”
Section: Sensory Inputs To the Cerebellummentioning
confidence: 99%