2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization, development and function of complex brain networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

38
1,358
1
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,868 publications
(1,423 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
38
1,358
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher local efficiency observed suggests elevated clustering of functionally related regions (Sporns et al 2004). This means that information processing within certain neural networks is stronger, with less cross‐talk between distinct functional processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher local efficiency observed suggests elevated clustering of functionally related regions (Sporns et al 2004). This means that information processing within certain neural networks is stronger, with less cross‐talk between distinct functional processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that information processing within certain neural networks is stronger, with less cross‐talk between distinct functional processes. This clustering of connections suggests hyperactive intermediate signalling (rather than long‐range signalling) in the network, perturbing the capacity for more global neural cooperation or wider cortical interactions (Sporns et al 2004). Higher local efficiency may also suggest higher likelihood of closed feedback loops and enhanced reciprocity of connections, meaning that information is not dispersed and processed across networks but remains closed off in a specific network model (Sporns et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach conveys a rather static idea of brain processes. By contrast, it is now believed that processing of a functional task by the brain can only be performed through interaction of segregated regions within a complex network (Hebb, 1949;Tononi et al, 1998;Frackowiak et al, 2004;Sporns et al, 2004). Consequently, various methods have been proposed in fMRI data analysis to extract information of interaction from datasets, most of which rely on either functional or effective connectivity (for reviews and discussions, see, e.g., Stone and Kö tter, 2002;Horwitz, 2003;Lee et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of networks in brain function has been increasingly recognized over the past decade [Friston et al, 1993;Sporns et al, 2004]. In functional neuroimaging, brain networks are primarily studied in terms of functional connectivity (defined as temporal correlations between remote neurophysiologic events) and effective connectivity (defined as the causal influence one neuronal system exerts over another) [Friston, 1995].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%