PsycEXTRA Dataset 1999
DOI: 10.1037/e445182005-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organization and components of psychomotor ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
16
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted a series of structural equation models with EQS for Windows, Version 5.7b (Bentler, 1995;Bentler & Wu, 1995) using a strategy similar to one we used previously (see Chaiken, Kyllonen, & Tirre, 2000, for details). Models differ in whether a single factor (M1, M1s), or multiple factors (all other models) underlie performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted a series of structural equation models with EQS for Windows, Version 5.7b (Bentler, 1995;Bentler & Wu, 1995) using a strategy similar to one we used previously (see Chaiken, Kyllonen, & Tirre, 2000, for details). Models differ in whether a single factor (M1, M1s), or multiple factors (all other models) underlie performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the study being reported here, we had administered a variety of tests to 5 different participants, and based on those results, we identified the best indicators of each of the four factors (those data are not reported here; only data from the 6th and 7th participants, combined, is reported). Because these four factors are directly pertinent to the issue of the relation between dynamic spatial ability (temporal processing) and PM ability, we thought that an analysis of those factors could be done to determine the generalizability of the initial Chaiken et al (2000) findings.…”
Section: Study 2: Time Estimation and Psychomotor Task Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent studies, however, have shown a modest relation between cognitive and psychomotor ability (Carretta & Ree, 1997a;Chaiken, Kyllonen, & Tirre, 2000;Rabbitt, Banerji, & Szymanski, 1989;Ree & Carretta, 1994;Tirre & Raouf, 1998), with uncorrected correlations between .20 and .69.…”
Section: Ree and Carrettamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Carretta and Ree (1997b) proposed that practical and technical knowledge also might contribute to this relation. Chaiken et al (2000) suggested that the relation might be explained by the role of working memory capacity (a surrogate of g; see Stauffer, Ree, & Carretta, 1996) in learning complex and novel tasks.…”
Section: Ree and Carrettamentioning
confidence: 98%