2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5221(01)00010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisational principles for co-operative firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
196
0
42

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
196
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…In a farmers' co-operative, the pooling of resources in the collective organization seems crucial as modern farming practices call for diversification and specialization (Hendrikse, Smit, & de al Vieter, 2007), which require significant investments in different processing technologies. What clearly speaks in favour of collectivistic motivations is that all the financial resources accumulated that go beyond the total sum of members' co-operative contributions are the members' (indivisible) common property to which no single individual can claim sole ownership rights (Bataille-Chedotel & Huntzinger, 2004;Nilsson, 2001). It is this collective resource pool that is a source of the co-operative's effectiveness in its environment and provides it with the ability to compete.…”
Section: Economic Exchange Interest and Expectation Of Economic Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a farmers' co-operative, the pooling of resources in the collective organization seems crucial as modern farming practices call for diversification and specialization (Hendrikse, Smit, & de al Vieter, 2007), which require significant investments in different processing technologies. What clearly speaks in favour of collectivistic motivations is that all the financial resources accumulated that go beyond the total sum of members' co-operative contributions are the members' (indivisible) common property to which no single individual can claim sole ownership rights (Bataille-Chedotel & Huntzinger, 2004;Nilsson, 2001). It is this collective resource pool that is a source of the co-operative's effectiveness in its environment and provides it with the ability to compete.…”
Section: Economic Exchange Interest and Expectation Of Economic Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The history of co-operation leads us to believe that the acknowledgement of this interdependence is relevant in terms of continuity of co-operation (Nilsson, 1996). Also successful democracy (in the vein of 'one-member-one-vote') requires a high degree of interdependence among members (e.g., Johnson, 2006;Cornforth, 2004;Nilsson, 2001). The interdependence is embedded in the structure of economic rationality and scale and awareness of benefits of co-operation.…”
Section: Forms Of Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the farmer-members through raw material prices, will distort market signals to the farmers+ Producers will mistakenly interpret such incomes as a sign of increased demand for their products Nilsson, 2001! and will tend to supply more raw materials~Royer, 1995!+ Finally, lack of transferability of residual claims on cooperative assets creates the horizon problem Hendrikse & Veerman, 1997;Nilsson, 1998;Vitaliano, 1983!…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the principals are a large number of individuals, each with their own -often conflicting -interests. There is no possibility for power concentration in co-operative membership, as is often the case in investor-driven firms (Nilsson, 2001). …”
Section: Costs Of Monitoring Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%