2016
DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2015.1125855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisational change: a solution-focused approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this study was to find out how the Skillful-Class intervention method helps students learn self-management and social-emotional skills at school and what the impacts of this intervention are on the relationships among students, teachers, and parents. With both quantitative and qualitative evidence, the current study confirms earlier research findings (DeJong & Berg, 2002;Morgan, 2016;Cepukiene et al, 2018) that SFA can create positive changes. Cepukiene and Pakrosnis' (2011) stated that SFBT can be especially useful for altering behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this study was to find out how the Skillful-Class intervention method helps students learn self-management and social-emotional skills at school and what the impacts of this intervention are on the relationships among students, teachers, and parents. With both quantitative and qualitative evidence, the current study confirms earlier research findings (DeJong & Berg, 2002;Morgan, 2016;Cepukiene et al, 2018) that SFA can create positive changes. Cepukiene and Pakrosnis' (2011) stated that SFBT can be especially useful for altering behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This study is based on the solution-focused approach (SFA) that was developed by Insoo Kim Berg andSteve de Shazer in 1980s (DeJong &Berg, 2002;de Shazer, 1985de Shazer, , 1988. SFA has been widely used in practice (Ajmal & Rees, 2001;Alexander & Sked, 2010;Morgan, 2016;Cepukiene, Pakrosnis, & Ulinskaite, 2018). It is a goal-directed, collaborative approach to psychotherapeutic change (Pichot, & Dolan, 2003;Lutz, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, psychological theories that are congruent with PCP, such as self‐determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2020) may also serve to enrich and help practitioners to better align the philosophy of PCP with its intended outcomes. An example is Morgan (2016) using a solution‐focused approach in conjunction with PCP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellem et al (2019) evaluated a family resourcing and capacity building project in Australia, considering the extent to which it provided knowledge, skills and confidence to families of people with a disability to create a better life. In the United Kingdom, Hughes et al (2019) and Morgan (2016) examined the role of using PATH in promoting organisational change, with school staff, and with a children's services department, respectively. McCausland et al (2021), examined the role of PCP in promoting community inclusion in a learning disability service in Dublin.…”
Section: The Application Of Pcp In Multidisciplinary Contexts: a Hete...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autzen (2018) mentioned also how ideas of change within organizational cultures struggle for survival in an evolutionary Darwinian process similar to biological evolution. Top-down strategies are not enough to bring about change, but must be combined with bottom-up knowledge, shared as explicit knowledge, vital in developing a learning and continuous development organization that is responsible for those changes so necessary for survival, improving the efficiency and performance of the company (Morgan, 2016). Airoldi (2013) defined the crucial points that must be included in any plan to implement organizational change strategies in order to generate cooperation among the organization's stakeholders and ideas that lead to efficiency and performance within the organization, these are encouraging the distribution of the sense of ownership of the parties in the implementation of the strategies, the analysis as a whole and not on the parties to determine the spending opportunities and alternatives in the allocation of budgets and last but not least the realization of a working model based on a clear theoretical framework.…”
Section: Change Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%