2016
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organisational assessment of three telehealth interventions in a European multicentre study: The United4Health project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that it would be important to take into account the presence or absence of a potential champion when planning an intervention such as this. Although the potential value of champions has been noted in earlier studies [7, 20, 22, 23], this condition for success has not featured strongly in prior accounts. Given the diversity within our sample with respect to this condition, it would seem that this aspect ought to be emphasized in future initiatives so the health care professionals in all settings can benefit from the champion aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that it would be important to take into account the presence or absence of a potential champion when planning an intervention such as this. Although the potential value of champions has been noted in earlier studies [7, 20, 22, 23], this condition for success has not featured strongly in prior accounts. Given the diversity within our sample with respect to this condition, it would seem that this aspect ought to be emphasized in future initiatives so the health care professionals in all settings can benefit from the champion aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a starting point, we reviewed existing telehealth maturity models for their approaches, strengths, and limitations. These models included the Telemedicine Service Maturity Model (TMSMM; van Dyk and Schutte, 2013); Hospital Telehealth Maturity Model (American Hospital Association, 2019); MOMENTUM-Telemedicine Readiness Self-Assessment Toolkit (Jensen et al, 2015); Strategy, Technology, Organisation, People, and Environment (STOPE) model (Abera et al, 2014); a readiness tool developed by the Pan American Health Organization and Inter-American Development Bank (2020); a taxonomy of telemedicine proposed by Bashshur et al (2011); compatibility requirements proposed by Bratan and Clarke (2005); and two papers describing a staged approach to evaluating telemedicine (DeChant et al, 1996;Jansen-Kosterink et al, 2016). Whilst there was some attention to macro/ meso factors, we found that earlier maturity models primarily focussed on readiness or were developed to support technology assessment and geared toward IT professionals, thus lacking sufficient detail outlining the range of clinical, organisational, and system milestones associated with higher levels of integrated care (van Dyk and Schutte, 2012).…”
Section: Relevance Of Maturity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%