Organic sulfur forms in mineral top soils of the Marsh in Schleswig-Holstein, Northern Germany

Mansfeldt, Tim; Blume, Hans‐Peter

doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200206)165:3<255::aid-jpln255>3.0.co;2-6

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Percentage distribution of inorganic-S fraction expressed as % of total-S accounted for 37.77%, which is only minor fraction compared with the major fraction of organic-S 62.23%.. These analytical obtained results are in accordance with the data obtained by Neptune et al (1975) and Mansfeldt & Blume (2002) and Hu et al (2002).…”

Section: Inorganic-sulfur Fractionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…Most agricultural soils contain total-S value between 100 and 500 mg S. kg -1 soil (Tabatabai, 1982). Similar results were obtained by Neptune et al (1975);and Mansfeldt & Blume (2002).…”

Section: Residual Inorganic Non-sulfate-s Form: Fraction (322)supporting

confidence: 89%

“…Recent research has been shown that the sedimentary organic-S compounds through the abiotic incorporation of reduced inorganic non-sulfate-S compounds are generated mainly by pathways involving the reactions of various S nucleophiles (reduced-S species such as hydrogen sulfide, polysulfides, elemental S o ) with functionalized organic molecules under a reducing environment (Morra et al, 1997 andMansfeldt &Blume, 2002). The reduction of sulfate-S which generates S-nucleophiles is mediated by microorganisms, but subsequent incorporation of the reduced S species into sedimentary organic matter is abiotic process (Mansfeldt & Blume 2002). In addition, the depositional conditions favorable for abiotic S incorporation could depend on the compeitition between S binding to organic matter, versus iron (Morra et al, 1997).…”

Section: Oxygenic Lowly Oxidized-s Plus Reduced-s Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this connection, it is worthy to note that, direct determination of some organic-S and inorganic-S compounds is not possible by the present analytical method. Sulfur X-ray absorption nearedge structure (XANES) spectroscopy will provide advantage over the classical wet methods used here (Morra et al, 1997 andMansfeldt &Blume, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Enzymatic Activities Involved in S- Transformations and Their Mutualistic Relationships With Inorganic-S Components and Distributions in Salt Affected Soils

El-Kammah

2008

Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive experimental study was conducted at three locations reflecting the semi-arid conditions of Kafr El-Sheikh governorate.The selected soils are slightly salt-affected and irrigated in non-rational rates for a long-time with different sources of wastewaters, under different drainage conditions. A novel conceptual diagram was constructed to integrate the main labile and stable inorganic-S fractions and the ways by which their amounts are determined and calculated.The aim of this study was to assess the biochemical activity of some soil enzymes involved in S-transformations and gain informations about the standing stocks and distributions of all inorganic-S fractions in studied soils under different drainage conditions. Statistical of treatment of the obtained data, could be summarized as follows:  Grand mean value of biological enzymes activity was 328.4 nanomoles SCNreleased.g -1 soil.hour -1 for rhodanese, meanwhile, dehydrogenases activity was 9.41 µg TPF produced. g -1 soil. hour -1 .  Total-S pool recorded 300 mg S. kg -1 soil, its standing stock 257.48 kg S. fed -1 , which was within the normal range reported in other regions.  Inorganic-S value was 111.3 mg S. kg -1 soil, its standing stock 96.6 kg S. fed -1 .Percentage total-S in inorganic-S accounted for 37.7%, which was only a minor fraction compared to the major fraction of organic-S. However, the content of this fraction was higher than reported from temperate and subtropical regions.  Inorganic sulfate-S content was 106.2 mg S. kg -1 , its percentage distribution expressed as % of total-S and of inorganic-S accounted for 36.3% and 95.6, which was the dominate fraction of inorganic-S fraction. This fraction was more pronounced in studied semi-arid soils in comparison with those reported in other regions. Its value had a positive correlation with soil clay content.  Easily soluble and adsorbed sulfate-S contents were 82.1 and 1.8 mg S. kg soil, their percentage distributions accounted for 77.6% and 1.3% of inorganic sulfate-S. Soluble sulfate-S was the major S form of inorganic sulfate-S and at the same time was greater in comparison with reported in literature. Adsorbed sulfate-S had the opposite trend and negative correlation with soil pH as well as positive with clay content.  Dissolved sulfate-S fraction contains insoluble sulfate-S plus Co-precipitated/Cocrystallized with CaCO3. Its value was 22.3 mg S-kg -1 soil accounted for 21.1% of inorganic sulfate-S, which was positive correlated with CaCO3 content.  Inorganic non-sulfate-S value was 5.2 mg S. kg -1 , accounted for 4.4% of inorganic-S, which was greater than reported in other regions and had a positive correlation with CaCO2 content. Oxygenic highly oxidized-S form and lowly oxidized-S plus reduced-S forms were 4.2 and 0.99 mg S. kg -1 soil, accounted for 84.2% and 15.8% of inorganic non-sulfate-S.El-Kammah, M.A.M. 6218 Contents total-S pool and all fractions of inorganic-S as well as their percentage distributions had their maximum values in traditional drained soils in w...

show abstract

Section: Inorganic-sulfur Fractionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…Most agricultural soils contain total-S value between 100 and 500 mg S. kg -1 soil (Tabatabai, 1982). Similar results were obtained by Neptune et al (1975);and Mansfeldt & Blume (2002).…”

Section: Residual Inorganic Non-sulfate-s Form: Fraction (322)supporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Oxygenic Lowly Oxidized-s Plus Reduced-s Formsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Enzymatic Activities Involved in S- Transformations and Their Mutualistic Relationships With Inorganic-S Components and Distributions in Salt Affected Soils

El-Kammah

2008

Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Diking and drainage of near‐surface groundwater plays a crucial role for pedogenetic processes in marshes ( Kuntze , 1986). These processes comprise (1) compaction and (2) desalination of the topsoil, (3) mineralization of “marine” derived organic matter, and (4) soil acidification by oxidation of sulfide‐bearing minerals that is concomitant with the (5) dissolution of carbonate minerals ( Brümmer et al, 1971; Müller‐Ahlten , 1994a, 1994b; Mansfeldt and Blume , 2002). It is expected that climate change will affect these pedogenetic processes and soil properties, but few attempts have been made to evaluate consequences for coastal marsh soils ( Blume and Müller‐Thomsen , 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of redox potential dynamics in a diked marsh soil: 1990 to 1993 versus 2011 to 2014

Dorau

Mansfeldt

2016

J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As revealed by an earlier study, young diked marsh soils on the west coast of Schleswig‐Holstein (Germany) are characterized by pronounced redox potential (EH) dynamics. Since soil forming processes occur over a short period of time in these man‐made environments, the impact of pedogenesis on EH was examined by comparing the EH dynamics measured from November 1989 to October 1993 (weekly measurements) with those measured from November 2010 to October 2014 (hourly measurements) at the same study site in Polder Speicherkoog, Northern Germany. In addition, the necessity for high resolution EH measurements was assessed as well as the impact of climate change on EH. Redox potentials were determined in both monitoring campaigns with permanently installed platinum electrodes at 10, 30, 60, 100, and 150 cm soil depths. Soil properties were determined in November 1989 and in August 2013. In 24 years of soil formation, bulk density was demonstrated to increase by 28.5% and 33.3% in 10 and 20 cm depths, respectively, and the sulfide‐bearing Protothionic horizon lowered from 105 to 135 cm below surface level. Overall, EH dynamics were similar at all soil depths during both study periods with topsoil compaction not affecting EH. Annual alterations of EH were primarily driven by the variable climatic water balance (CWB) and by the corresponding water table (WT) fluctuations. These fluctuations resulted in occasional aeration of the subsoil and subsequent oxidation of sulfides. A forecast of CWB to 2100 predicts an intensified WT drawdown by elevated evapotranspiration rates that should amplify sulfide oxidation. To deduce the soil redox status on a seasonal or annual scale, readings taken at daily intervals are sufficient. To identify biogeochemical processes, it is necessary to monitor EH on an hourly basis because increases in EH values of up to 540 mV have been observed within a 24 hour period in temporarily waterlogged horizons.

show abstract

Effects of Wetland Restoration on Sulfur and Arylsulfatase in Mangrove Surface Soils at Jinjiang Estuary (Fujian, China)

Deng

Ji²,

et al. 2018

Wetlands

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organic sulfur forms in mineral top soils of the Marsh in Schleswig-Holstein, Northern Germany

Cited by 7 publications

References 28 publications

Enzymatic Activities Involved in S- Transformations and Their Mutualistic Relationships With Inorganic-S Components and Distributions in Salt Affected Soils

Enzymatic Activities Involved in S- Transformations and Their Mutualistic Relationships With Inorganic-S Components and Distributions in Salt Affected Soils

Comparison of redox potential dynamics in a diked marsh soil: 1990 to 1993 versus 2011 to 2014

Effects of Wetland Restoration on Sulfur and Arylsulfatase in Mangrove Surface Soils at Jinjiang Estuary (Fujian, China)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About