“…Comparing the TPMC data between the experimental results and prediction values, the second-degree model had a better fit in predicting than the first-degree model, similar to the MMAD data comparison; this result was confirmed by the higher mean of the coefficient of determination (Figure 9a Besides wood moisture content and drying time, there may be other combustion rate variables that should be considered, such as air flow rate, pressure, atmosphere relative humidity, oxygen concentration in the atmosphere, and others. For example, water vapor, CO2, N2, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are usually the result of a fuel-rich combustion at high temperatures (over 900 °C) [32][33][34]. Conversely, this is different from combustion at low temperatures (under 700 °C), resulting in CO, volatile organic compounds, Besides wood moisture content and drying time, there may be other combustion rate variables that should be considered, such as air flow rate, pressure, atmosphere relative humidity, oxygen concentration in the atmosphere, and others.…”