2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1514831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic light-emitting devices with extended operating lifetimes on plastic substrates

Abstract: We fabricate long-lived organic light-emitting devices using a 175 μm thick polyethylene terephthalate substrate coated with an organic–inorganic multilayered barrier film and compare the rate of degradation to glass-based devices. The observed permeation rate of water vapor through the plastic substrate was estimated to be 2×10−6 g/m2/day. Driven at 2.5 mA/cm2, we measure a device lifetime of 3800 h from an initial luminance of 425 cd/m2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
189
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
189
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Because the moisture permeation properties of a single layer barrier are eventually limited by the defect density of the layer, 6 the deposition of multilayer structures is expected to be the path towards the WVTR requirements mentioned above. [7][8][9] The multilayer structures will become most effective when the individual layers themselves have excellent permeation properties.…”
Section: Plasma-assisted Atomic Layer Deposition Of Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Because the moisture permeation properties of a single layer barrier are eventually limited by the defect density of the layer, 6 the deposition of multilayer structures is expected to be the path towards the WVTR requirements mentioned above. [7][8][9] The multilayer structures will become most effective when the individual layers themselves have excellent permeation properties.…”
Section: Plasma-assisted Atomic Layer Deposition Of Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, the short lifetime is still a critical factor, which greatly limits the industrialization of OLEDs. The organic materials in the light-emitting layer are susceptible to be damaged under air.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Additionally, the electrode materials may be negatively affected by oxidation. 6,8 In that case, the evolution of "dark spots" was identified as the principal degradation mechanism. Operating OLEDs in air resulted in a vast majority of loss of electroluminescent (EL) intensity in incipient several hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116,119 Due to the high sensitivity of organic materials such as polymers, organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices and organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) are normally encapsulated by a thin protective oxide layer which protects them from oxidative species such as water and oxygen. 120,121,122 Various oxide layers such as In2O3, SnO2, ZnO, and their mixtures, 123 and other oxide thin films including Al2O3 124 or ZrO2, 125 and their combination in the form of Al2O3/ZrO2 multilayer structures, 126,127 have been adopted as TCOs and studied for the protection of such organic devices.…”
Section: Current Status 1231 Microelectronic (Dram and Cmos) Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that different conditions could also enhance morphology changes for DC sputtered Ru films (for instance, higher sputter gas pressures can induce columnar growth in Ru), 141 but in the study by Shin et al, 140 the conditions were chosen such that smooth Ru films (~0.11 nm RMS roughness) were obtained using DC sputtering. However, even though several CVD studies have produced smoother Ru films, 142,143,144 the RMS roughness was still larger in most cases than by DC sputtering, and the substrate temperature during deposition could not be lower than ~150°C for Ru nucleation, which is often problematic for flexible electronic devices such as OPV or OLEDs, due to the possible degradation of their organic substrates, 120,121,122 or for EUVL optics, due to Mo/Si intermixing. 145 In addition, for this last application, since EUVL optics consist of large, heavily curved mirrors, there is a necessity of lateral thickness profiles, which cannot be achieved by chemical deposition techniques that produce conformal coatings, and only physical methods such as PVD can provide a thickness gradient along the mirror surface, by means of masking or velocity profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%