The Organic Carbon Cycle in the Arctic Ocean 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18912-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organic Carbon in Arctic Ocean Sediments: Sources, Variability, Burial, and Paleoenvironmental Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicit in these estimates is the assertion that unlike the traditional model of open ocean carbon dynamics where inputs are largely marine-derived and rapidly recycled, the abundant terrestrial organic carbon delivered to Arctic sediments is sequestered over much longer timescales. Few estimates of the differences in remineralization rates between marine versus terrestrial organic substrates exist for Arctic regions, but generalized pan-Arctic carbon cycle box models suggest marine organic matter on Arctic shelves is oxidized up to 70 times faster than shelf terrestrial organic matter (Stein and Macdonald, 2004a). The difference in recycling between marine and terrestrial sources and its implications for the rate of carbon turnover in sediments necessitate improved quantitative evaluations of preserved vascular plant, soil, water column phytoplankton, and sea-ice algae components in modern and historical Arctic sediments for modeling of the Arctic carbon cycle.…”
Section: Implications For Arctic Organic Carbon Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implicit in these estimates is the assertion that unlike the traditional model of open ocean carbon dynamics where inputs are largely marine-derived and rapidly recycled, the abundant terrestrial organic carbon delivered to Arctic sediments is sequestered over much longer timescales. Few estimates of the differences in remineralization rates between marine versus terrestrial organic substrates exist for Arctic regions, but generalized pan-Arctic carbon cycle box models suggest marine organic matter on Arctic shelves is oxidized up to 70 times faster than shelf terrestrial organic matter (Stein and Macdonald, 2004a). The difference in recycling between marine and terrestrial sources and its implications for the rate of carbon turnover in sediments necessitate improved quantitative evaluations of preserved vascular plant, soil, water column phytoplankton, and sea-ice algae components in modern and historical Arctic sediments for modeling of the Arctic carbon cycle.…”
Section: Implications For Arctic Organic Carbon Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coastal erosion also provides a significant quantity of terrestrial carbon to the Arctic, estimated in some locations to be greater than the delivery from rivers (Rachold et al, 2004). Local and regional carbon budgets are being developed for the Arctic (Macdonald et al, 1998;Stein and Macdonald, 2004a); yet estimates of organic carbon reservoirs in the water column and sediments are lacking in many Arctic locations. The marine organic carbon component is better constrained, as primary productivity and microbial respiration have been measured over the wide continental shelves of the Arctic Gosselin et al, 1997;Arnosti et al, 2005;Bates et al, 2005a;Hill and Cota, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data contradict the traditional approach of conservative behavior of DOC in mixing zones, in which the concentration of DOC decreases due to dilution of river water by sea water. Increased values of DOC in this case were explained by researchers as experimental uncertainty [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Following Davie and Buffett [], α ( y ) is a decreasing exponential function which depends on the total organic carbon (TOC) at the surface and its labile fraction. At the Beaufort Sea Shelf, TOC = 1.2% of which 35% is labile [ Pelletier , ; Stein et al , ].…”
Section: Numerical Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%