2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13293-016-0088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organ transplantation and gender differences: a paradigmatic example of intertwining between biological and sociocultural determinants

Abstract: Organ transplantation, e.g., of the heart, liver, or kidney, is nowadays a routine strategy to counteract several lethal human pathologies. From literature data and from data obtained in Italy, a striking scenario appears well evident: women are more often donors than recipients. On the other hand, recipients of organs are mainly males, probably reflecting a gender bias in the incidence of transplant-related pathologies. The impact of sex mismatch on transplant outcome remains debated, even though donor-recipi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
68
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
9
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And our observed lower likelihood of LD transplantation for women is consistent with the well documented higher proportion of female‐to‐male compared to male‐to‐female LD . These gender discrepancies likely represent a complex of biological and socio‐cultural determinants . Segev et al reported that age and comorbidities were effect modifiers of gender disparities in access to renal transplantation in the US population, concluding that there was no disparity for women in general but rather marker disparity for older women and those with comorbidities .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And our observed lower likelihood of LD transplantation for women is consistent with the well documented higher proportion of female‐to‐male compared to male‐to‐female LD . These gender discrepancies likely represent a complex of biological and socio‐cultural determinants . Segev et al reported that age and comorbidities were effect modifiers of gender disparities in access to renal transplantation in the US population, concluding that there was no disparity for women in general but rather marker disparity for older women and those with comorbidities .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…38 These gender discrepancies likely represent a complex of biological and socio-cultural determinants. [39][40][41] Segev et al reported that age and comorbidities were effect modifiers of gender disparities in access to renal transplantation in the US population, concluding that there was no disparity for women in general but rather marker disparity for older women and those with comorbidities. 37 We saw the effect size of female gender increase in our multivariate model compared with univariate analysis (SHR 0.85 vs 0.91); however, the exploration of effect modifiers was beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that male sex serves an independent prognostic factors for the progression to allograft failure is in line with previous studies which reported that recipient male gender confers a worse prognosis for allograft survival in a large retrospective cohort [27]. This gender differences may partially be explained by the fact that women are protected by hormones and appear to be more compliant than male recipients [28,29]. Other clinical parameters predicting outcome at the univariate analysis, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although gender difference in heart transplantation regarding the incidence of AMR and mortality has been described, 11 these results were derived from large retrospective registry studies. 9,12 However, because of the size of these databases, important confounding variables such as pfDSA could not be taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%