2015
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organ-specific differences in achieving tolerance

Abstract: Purpose of review When it comes to tolerance induction, kidney allografts behave differently from heart allografts which behave differently from lung allografts. Here, we examine how and why different organ allografts respond differently to the same tolerance induction protocol. Recent findings Allograft tolerance has been achieved in experimental and clinical kidney transplantation. However, inducing tolerance in experimental recipients of heart and lung allografts has proven to be more challenging. New pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion of organ-specific differences in immune-modulatory properties is well known in the field of transplant immunology, where kidney and liver transplants require far less immune-suppression than lungs and hearts to prevent rejection. 43 Therefore, it is feasible that the immune-modulatory response from RT is also organ-dependent, as our analysis suggests. Notably, three of the CRs had primary melanoma, yielding a 30% CR rate (3 of 10 evaluable patients) for melanoma patients (0-22% in prior reports 3,10,35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This notion of organ-specific differences in immune-modulatory properties is well known in the field of transplant immunology, where kidney and liver transplants require far less immune-suppression than lungs and hearts to prevent rejection. 43 Therefore, it is feasible that the immune-modulatory response from RT is also organ-dependent, as our analysis suggests. Notably, three of the CRs had primary melanoma, yielding a 30% CR rate (3 of 10 evaluable patients) for melanoma patients (0-22% in prior reports 3,10,35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, when heart and kidney allografts from the same MHC-mismatched donor were co-transplanted under a 12-day course of tacrolimus, recipients uniformly became tolerant of both organs (5). These studies demonstrate that the ability of a particular tolerance protocol to induce long-term unresponsiveness is organ-specific (6). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…5 These studies demonstrate that the ability of a particular tolerance protocol to induce long-term unresponsiveness is organ-specific. 6 Given the striking organ-specific differences we have observed in the ability of tolerance-induction protocols to achieve immune unresponsiveness, we asked whether the effects of brain death and ischemia on tolerance induction would also differ depending on the organ transplanted. Here we show that in contrast to lung allograft recipients, donor brain death and prolonged organ ischemia did not prevent tolerance induction in isolated kidney or heart plus kidney allograft recipients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some organs, such as kidney and liver, are tolerance-prone, whereas others, such as heart and lung, are tolerance-resistant. 58 …”
Section: Tolerance: All Organs Are Not Created Equalmentioning
confidence: 99%