Organ-sparing reconstructive surgery in penile cancer: initial experiences at two Swedish referral centres

Abstract

Organ-sparing reconstructive surgery in penile cancer: initial experiences at two Swedish referral centres.Håkansson, Ulf; Kirrander, Peter; Uvelius, Bengt; Baseckas, Gediminas; Torbrand, Christian Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Håkansson, U., Kirrander, P., Uvelius, B., Baseckas, G., & Torbrand, C. (2015). Organ-sparing reconstructive surgery in penile cancer: initial experiences at two Swedish referral centres. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 49(2), 149-154. DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2014.955822 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Conclusions: GR and TGN seem to be oncologically safe procedures for treating carefully selected patients with penile cancer, and the functional and cosmetic results are promising.Based on our findings, we recommend that penile amputation should only be carried out in patients not suitable for organ-sparing reconstructive surgery.

A study into the association between local recurrence rates and surgical resection margins in organ‐sparing surgery for penile squamous cell cancer

“…Further developments in surgical techniques, including glans resurfacing, and a better understanding of recurrence patterns have resulted in closer resection margins generally . The aim of the present study was to review our experience of OSS and determine oncologically safe surgical margins and to assess patterns of local recurrence and local recurrence rates in this developing field.…”

Câncer de pênis: aspectos epidemiológicos, psicológicos e fatores de risco

“…De acordo com à multiculturalidade, os artigos revisados entram em consonância no quesito estética, afirmando que não há grandes insatisfações após a penectomia parcial, uma vez que tal procedimentos é amplamente disseminado por ser padrão-ouro no tratamento do câncer de pênis (DJAJADININGRAT et al, 2014;DO COUTO et al, 2014;HAKANSSON et al, 2015;GAO et al, 2016;AUDENET;SFAKIANOS, 2017;SOSNOWSKI et al, 2017;COELHO et al, 2018).…”

Glans Resurfacing in Carcinoma in situ of the Penis: A Case Report

“…There are few published studies addressing the surgical procedure of glans resurfacing in these patients [3,[8][9][10][11][12]. The largest study was published by Shabbir and co-workers who described a series of 25 CIS patients treated with partial or total glans resurfacing, reporting an overall recurrence rate of 4% and no cases of disease progression after 29 months of follow-up [3].…”