Organ motion and its management

Dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat prostate and pelvic nodes using the Varian 120‐leaf Millennium multileaf collimator (MLC) has been implemented in our clinic. This paper describes the procedures that have been undertaken to achieve this, including some of the commissioning aspects of Helios, verification of the dynamic dose delivery, and quality assurance (QA) of the dose delivered to the patient. Commissioning of Helios included measurements of transmission through the 120‐leaf MLC, which were found to be 1.7% for 6 mV and 1.8% for 10 MV. The rounded leaf edge effect, known as the dosimetric separation, was also determined using two independent methods. Values of 1.05 and 1.65 mm were obtained for 6 and 10 MV beams. Five test patients were planned for prostate and pelvic node irradiation to 70 and 50 Gy, respectively. Dose and fluence verification were carried out on specially designed phantoms and dose points in the prostate were measured to be within 2.0% (mean 0.9%, s.d. 0.6%) of the calculated dose and in the nodes within 3.0% (mean 1.6%, s.d. 1.1%). Following the results of this commissioning and implementation study, we have started to treat men with a target volume including the prostate and pelvic nodes using Helios optimized dynamic IMRT delivery in a dose escalation protocol.PACS number(s): 87.53.–j, 87.90.+y

Section: Patient Quality Assurance During Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

IMRT clinical implementation: Prostate and pelvic node irradiation using Helios and a 120‐leaf multileaf collimator

Clark

Mubata

Meehan

et al. 2002

“…An important issue in prostate radiotherapy is the toxicity of the rectum and bladder, which can be improved by the accurate localization of the treatment target and the reduction of the treatment margins. The displacement and deformation of the prostate and surrounding organs are important factors in the consideration of treatment margins for external radiotherapy of prostate cancer 1 , 2 , 3 . The effects of inter‐ and intrafractional motion and deformation of the treatment target during prostate radiotherapy have been investigated using various imaging techniques in order to develop practical margin recipes for commonly available treatment setup and target localization techniques.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intrafractional prostate motion during external beam radiotherapy monitored by a real‐time target localization system

Chen

et al. 2015

This paper investigates the clinical significance of real‐time monitoring of intrafractional prostate motion during external beam radiotherapy using a commercial 4D localization system. Intrafractional prostate motion was tracked during 8,660 treatment fractions for 236 patients. The following statistics were analyzed: 1) the percentage of fractions in which the prostate shifted 2−7 mm for a certain duration; 2) the proportion of the entire tracking time during which the prostate shifted 2−7 mm; and 3) the proportion of each minute in which the shift exceeded 2−7 mm. The ten patients exhibiting maximum intrafractional‐motion patterns were analyzed separately. Our results showed that the percentage of fractions in which the prostate shifted by >2,3,5,and 7 mm off the baseline in any direction for >30 normals was 56.8%, 27.2%, 4.6%, and 0.7% for intact prostate and 68.7%, 35.6%, 10.1%, and 1.8% for postprostatectomy patients, respectively. For the ten patients, these percentages were 91.3%, 72.4%, 36.3%, and 6%, respectively. The percentage of tracking time during which the prostate shifted >2,3,5,and 7 mm was 27.8%, 10.7%, 1.6%, and 0.3%, respectively, and it was 56.2%, 33.7%, 11.2%, and 2.1%, respectively, for the ten patients. The percentage of tracking time for a >3 mm posterior motion was four to five times higher than that in other directions. For treatments completed in 5 min (VMAT) and 10 min (IMRT), the proportion for the prostate to shift by >3 mm was 4% and 12%, respectively. Although intrafractional prostate motion was generally small, caution should be taken for patients who exhibit frequent large intrafractional motion. For those patients, adjustment of patient positioning may be necessary or a larger treatment margin may be used. After the initial alignment, the likelihood of prostate motion increases with time. Therefore, it is favorable to use advanced techniques (e.g., VMAT) that require less delivery time in order to reduce the treatment uncertainty resulting from intrafractional prostate motion.PACS number: 87.50.S‐, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.N‐, 87.55.ne

“…Organ motion has been studied extensively in adults,5, 8, 13 and published results vary widely. In large reviews, liver motion in individual studies has ranged from 8 mm to 25 mm on average, as compared to our study which found the maximum motion in any dimension of the liver to be 4.5 mm on average in the pediatric population 13.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organ motion in pediatric high‐risk neuroblastoma patients using four‐dimensional computed tomography

Kannan

Teo

Solberg

et al. 2016

Purpose/objective(s)High‐risk neuroblastoma (HR‐NBL) requires multimodality treatment, including external beam radiation of the primary tumor site following resection. Radiotherapy planning must take into account motion of the target and adjacent normal anatomy, both of which are poorly understood in the pediatric population, and which may differ significantly from those in adults.Methods/materialsWe examined 4DCT scans of 15 consecutive pediatric patients treated for HR‐NBL, most with tumors in the abdominal cavity. The diaphragm and organs at risk were contoured at full inhale, full exhale, and on free‐breathing scans. Maximum displacement of organs between full inhale and full exhale was measured in the anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, left, and right directions, as was displacement of centroids in the A/P, S/I, and L/R axes. Contours on free‐breathing scans were compared to those on 4D scans.ResultsMaximum displacement was along the S/I axis, with the superior aspects of organs moving more than the inferior, implying organ compression with respiration. Liver and spleen exhibited the largest motion, which correlated strongly with the S/I motion of the diaphragm. The maximum organ motion observed in the abdomen and thorax were 4.5 mm and 7.4 mm, respectively, while maximum diaphragm displacement was 5.7 mm. Overall findings mirrored observations in adults, but with smaller magnitudes, as expected. No consistent margins could be added to the free‐breathing scans to encompass the motion determined using 4DCT.ConclusionsOrgan motion within the pediatric abdomen and pelvis is similar to that observed in adults, but with smaller magnitude. Precise margins to accommodate motion are patient‐specific, underscoring the need for 4DCT scanning when possible.