As a common Ca‐ and Ti‐ bearing silicate mineral in many types of hydrothermal deposits, titanite usually contains high concentrations of trace elements. Its mineral chemistry and U–Pb isotope can reveal the physicochemical conditions and geochronology of the ore‐forming systems. In this contribution, we present a detailed study on titanite which precipitated during the Fe mineralization in the Duotoushan deposit. Due to coexistence with hydrothermal minerals, low Th/U ratios (0.02–0.3), and depletion in rare earth elements (REE), all the studied titanites are classified into a hydrothermal group. The negative correlation between [REE3+ + (Al, Fe)3+] and [Ca2+ + Ti4+] indicates that REE mainly entered the lattice of titanite via the mechanism of substitution. In addition, titanite grains are characterized by HREE, Zr, and Nb enrichments with LREE depletion, suggesting that the complexation of F− at neutral to alkaline pH conditions may have caused the fractionation of REE. At Duotoushan, the titanite grains coexist with quartz, epidote, amphibole, and magnetite, and exhibit positive Eu anomalies (δEu = 1.04–1.31) but lack Ce anomalies, indicating that ore‐forming fluids may have been derived from a relatively low oxygen fugacity and high fH2O environment. Titanite yielded an in‐situ U–Pb lower‐intercept age of 307.2 ± 4.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.97), consistent with the syn‐ore amphibole 40Ar‐39Ar plateau age (305 ± 6 Ma). Since the mineralization ages are obviously younger than country rocks, the previous syn‐sedimentary ore‐forming model for Duotoushan Fe–Cu mineralization can be excluded. Integrating the characteristics from ore deposit geology, periods of mineralization events, and spatial–temporal distribution of magmatism, we proposed that the Duotoushan Fe–Cu mineralization event may be linked with a hidden granite in its orefield.