2012
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2012.675145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orderly order in protein intrinsic disorder distribution: disorder in 3500 proteomes from viruses and the three domains of life

Abstract: Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions are highly abundant in nature. However, the quantitative and qualitative measures of protein intrinsic disorder in species with known genomes are still not available. Furthermore, although the correlation between high fraction of disordered residues and advanced species has been reported, the details of this correlation and the connection between the disorder content and proteome complexity have not been reported as of yet. To fill … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
451
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(475 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
21
451
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have hypothesized that intrinsically disordered hub proteins are advantageous in complex systems because they simplify multicomponent networks by allowing many binding partners to be organized around a single hub (15,14). Dozens of different proteins are localized specifically to Caulobacter cell poles (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some have hypothesized that intrinsically disordered hub proteins are advantageous in complex systems because they simplify multicomponent networks by allowing many binding partners to be organized around a single hub (15,14). Dozens of different proteins are localized specifically to Caulobacter cell poles (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eukaryotic genomes, which produce many complex networks, contain a relatively high amount of protein disorder (14), and this has led to the hypothesis that the evolution of higher organisms has favored intrinsically disordered protein interactions as a means of handling complexity (15).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous computational studies have revealed that IDPs/ IDPRs are more common in eukaryotes than in less complex organisms (82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90). Furthermore, regions of eukaryotic mRNA affected by alternative splicing often code for IDPRs, suggesting that the invention of this intrinsic disorder/alternative splicing duet was an evolutionary breakthrough that eventually generated multicellular organisms (91).…”
Section: Evolution Of Intrinsic Disorder: Back To the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have witnessed a dramatic change in the understanding of the natural abundance of IDPs/IDPRs from some obscure, rare, and easily countable exceptions (in the early days), to the currently accepted abundant normality, where the prevalence of IDPs/IDPRs in various proteomes and biological processes is a well recognized reality (82)(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90). In other words, protein science transitioned from searching for "Where can you find disorder?"…”
Section: Natural Abundance Of Idps: Where Do You Not Find Disorder?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDPs/IDPRs do not have a unique 3D structure as a whole or in part and exist as dynamic ensembles characterized by different degree and depth of disorder. 24 IDPs are abundant in all proteomes [25][26] and possess a wide spectrum of biological functions that are typically related to regulation, signaling, and control pathways, promote the assembly of supra-molecular complexes, and complement the functions of ordered proteins. 24 IDPs/IDPRs possess complex 'anatomy' (they contain multiple, relatively short functional elements), which contributes to their unique 'physiology' (an ability to be involved in interaction with, regulation of and control by multiple structurally unrelated partners).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%