Ordering power? The politics of state-led housing delivery under authoritarianism – the case of Luanda, Angola

Abstract

The urban studies literature has extensively analysed the modernist, developmental or neoliberal drivers of urban restructuring in the global South, but has largely overlooked the ways in which governments, particularly those with authoritarian characteristics, try to reinforce their legitimacy and assert their political authority through the creation of satellite cities and housing developments. From Ethiopia to Singapore, authoritarian regimes have recently provided housing to the middle class and the poor, not only to alleviate housing shortages, or bolster a burgeoning real estate market, but also to ‘order power’ and buy the loyalty of residents. To evaluate the extent to which authoritarian regimes realise their political objectives through housing provision, we survey nearly 300 poor and middle class respondents from three new housing projects in Luanda, Angola. Alongside increasing social and spatial differentiation brought about by state policies, we document unintended beneficiaries of state housing and uneven levels of citizen satisfaction. We explain that internal state contradictions, individual agency and market forces have acted together to re-shape the government’s efforts to order power.

‘An open secret’: Public housing and downward raiding in Rio de Janeiro

“…not just in peripheral slums of Southern cities). For example, recently published research from Angola (Croese and Pitcher, 2019) reveals that downward raiding is happening in statesubsidised (formal) housing for low-income residents and that, similar to Elizete Cardoso, the state plays a decisive role. Similarly, in South Africa (Del Mistro and Hensher, 2009), it has recently been observed that formal land titling can induce downward raiding, particularly when accompanied by urban infrastructure upgrades.…”

‘Proceed to your death’: Lakuwa, environmental disaster management, and the culture of oil politics in Nigeria

“…6 Now, more than two decades after the first protest, there has been a shift from mechanized harvesting through contractual arrangements between the state and contractors to a system where hands are used in harvesting the invasive species. This shift occurred because successive regimes of civilian government and other development intervention agencies, instituted by both federal and state governments, came to see a perceived ecological disaster as a tool for cultivating political support and distributing public goods and social services in order to placate communities (Ballard 2013;Croese and Pitcher, 2017). However, this 'new politics of distribution' (Ferguson, 2015) works to create what Olivier de Sardan (1999: 25) aptly describes as 'social mechanisms of corruption'.…”

“…More importantly, we observed during this study that the organization is ever present at every public function of the OSOPADEC, with members always dressed in colorful t-shirts bearing the names of both OSOPADEC and the Lakuwa Vanguard. Hence, rather than be seen as a vanguard that intends to end ecological disaster, it has become a vanguard for the distribution of political and public goods by the state government through its agency -OSOPADEC -to persons who are loyal to those in power (Croese and Pitcher, 2017;Ferguson, 2015).…”

State-led housing development in Brazil and India: a machinery for enabling strategy?

“…Colombia has taken this further by introducing a radical housing policy to provide 100,000 free homes every year to respond to the country's endemic housing problems (Gilbert, 2016). Even the authoritarian Angolan government delivered housing of unprecedented scale allocating 3.2% of the annual state budget on housing between 2004 and 2014 (Croese and Pitcher, 2017). In China, the social housing programme has been expanding at a dazzling speed marked by a target of building 10 million social housing units every year (Wang and Shao, 2014;Chen et al, 2014).…”

“…Large-scale, centralised housing schemes have risen dramatically across Asia, Africa or Latin America. Whether the expansion of the state housing programmes is part of the governments' populist agenda (Gilbert 2016;Croese and Pitcher, 2017), or a 'corrective measure to overcome market failure' (Wang and Shao, 2014;Magalhães, 2018), or it simply reflects what Buckley et. al.…”