2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.94.024330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordering of the0d5/2and1s1/2proton levels in light nuclei

Abstract: A survey of the available single-proton data in A ≤ 17 nuclei was completed. These data, along with calculations using a Woods-Saxon potential, show that the ordering of the 0d 5/2 and 1s 1/2 proton orbitals are determined primarily by the proximity of the s-state proton energy to the Coulomb barrier. This is analogous to the dependence of the corresponding neutron orbitals in proximity to the neutron threshold, that was previously discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest states 0 − and 1 − in 16 terises the 2 − and 3 − states. The widths of all four states are consistent with single-proton states [21]. Population of d-states in 16 F have larger probability than s-states for light targets, while in reactions in the lead target mainly s-states are populated.…”
Section: Relative Energy Spectrasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The lowest states 0 − and 1 − in 16 terises the 2 − and 3 − states. The widths of all four states are consistent with single-proton states [21]. Population of d-states in 16 F have larger probability than s-states for light targets, while in reactions in the lead target mainly s-states are populated.…”
Section: Relative Energy Spectrasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Such effects had already been noted by Bohr and Mottelson [9]. The bulk features of the dramatic variations in the separation of the proton and neutron 1s and 0d orbitals between He and O can be attributed to weak-binding effects on the s states, with the tensor and spin-orbit components of the residual two-body protonneutron interaction accounting for only a small fraction of the total change [7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Such effects had already been noted by Bohr and Mottelson [9]. The bulk features of the dramatic variations in the separation of the proton and neutron 1s and 0d orbitals between He and O can be attributed to weak-binding effects on the s states, with the tensor and spin-orbit components of the residual two-body protonneutron interaction accounting for only a small fraction of the total change [7,8].The 'lingering' effect means that the rate at which the eigenstate moves with changing radius of the potential, changes as the state approaches zero binding. Hamamoto and Sagawa [10] explored the splitting between the 1p 3/2 -1p 1/2 states for a generic A = 44 system using a finite nuclear potential and observed a substantial decrease in the splitting as the 1p 1/2 moved close to threshold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional shell model and magic numbers are obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in a mean field potential. In the light nuclei region, especially approaching the neutron or proton drip line, many factors could contribute to the change or disappearance of the conventional shells, such as the monopole interaction between proton and neutron [1], the weak binding of the nucleons approaching the drip line [2][3][4], and the three-body force in nuclei [5]. As a well-recognized example, the ground state (1/2 + ) and the first excited state (1/2 − ) of the halo nucleus 11 Be are inverted with respect to the predictions from conventional independent particle shell model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%