2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordered nano-structured mesoporous CMK-8 and other carbonaceous positive electrodes for rechargeable aluminum batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected from half-cell experiments, AIB with CXG 500 material exhibited best charge/discharge behaviour up to 28 mAh g −1 at 0.1 A g −1 with nearly 98% coulombic and 60% energy efficiency (see Figure 8 ). This value is in good agreement with recently published values for soft-carbon (SC) electrodes from Li et al [ 82 ] who found a capacity of 28.2 mAh g −1 at 0.3 A g −1 current density. With increasing R/C ratio, however, the performance of AIB dropped continuously from about 15–20 mAh g −1 for cells with CXG 750 and CXG 1000 materials to a few mAh for the other systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected from half-cell experiments, AIB with CXG 500 material exhibited best charge/discharge behaviour up to 28 mAh g −1 at 0.1 A g −1 with nearly 98% coulombic and 60% energy efficiency (see Figure 8 ). This value is in good agreement with recently published values for soft-carbon (SC) electrodes from Li et al [ 82 ] who found a capacity of 28.2 mAh g −1 at 0.3 A g −1 current density. With increasing R/C ratio, however, the performance of AIB dropped continuously from about 15–20 mAh g −1 for cells with CXG 750 and CXG 1000 materials to a few mAh for the other systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decrease in capacity with an increasing current is mainly due to the capacitive behavior (the charge stores near the electrode surface) dominating over the diffusion-controlled process at a high current. 65 The cycling performance of this electrode (Figure 7d) suggests that its capacity decays sharply in the first 20 cycles and then stabilizes after 50 cycles, with the capacity reaching only ∼40 mAh/g and a retention rate of around 22%, although the CE is somehow satisfactory (>95% for most cycles). A similar rate capability and cycling performance for the TiO 2 electrode derived from [Bmim]BF 4 have been observed (panels b and e of Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The charge/discharge capacity for the TiO 2 electrode from [Bmim]Br decreases with an increasing current density from ∼150 mAh/g at 20 mA/g to <50 mAh/g at 200 mA/g, as shown in Figure a, indicating its poor performance at high current densities. The decrease in capacity with an increasing current is mainly due to the capacitive behavior (the charge stores near the electrode surface) dominating over the diffusion-controlled process at a high current . The cycling performance of this electrode (Figure d) suggests that its capacity decays sharply in the first 20 cycles and then stabilizes after 50 cycles, with the capacity reaching only ∼40 mAh/g and a retention rate of around 22%, although the CE is somehow satisfactory (>95% for most cycles).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Concretely, carbon-based materials possess high voltage and robust structures but limited capacity. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Highcapacity transition metal compounds exhibit low voltage and short cycling life. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Accordingly, it is imperative to ameliorate the aluminum-storage properties of cathode materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%