1985
DOI: 10.1137/0722031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Order Results for Implicit Runge–Kutta Methods Applied to Stiff Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time derivatives of u are not zero at the boundary; and then the analysis in Example 3.1 shows that the term i- 5 (1/96) A~ uk 2 > behaves only like i-2 · 5 uniformly in h, leading to a decrease in local order of 2.5 units. The other terms of the local error involve higher powers of -r or lower powers of Ah and therefore suffer from reductions which harm less than that of the i-5 A~ uk 2 ' term.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time derivatives of u are not zero at the boundary; and then the analysis in Example 3.1 shows that the term i- 5 (1/96) A~ uk 2 > behaves only like i-2 · 5 uniformly in h, leading to a decrease in local order of 2.5 units. The other terms of the local error involve higher powers of -r or lower powers of Ah and therefore suffer from reductions which harm less than that of the i-5 A~ uk 2 ' term.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to stiff systems of ODEs, not necessarily semi-discrete PDEs, these schemes also suffer from reduction of the order. This is the central issue of the B-convergence theory developed in [5]. In fact, the MOL paper [12] heavily relies on results from the B-convergence theory, whereas [1] is completely independent of it and concentrates on discretizations of ODEs in Banach space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under appropriate stability assumptions one can easily obtain a stiffness-independent convergence result, involving only derivatives of y(t), with an order of convergence equal to the stage order q, see Section 2. Convergence results of this type are well known for Runge-Kutta methods, see for instance Dekker & Verwer (1984), Frank et al (1985b) and Hairer & Wanner (1991). In the latter reference such results were also derived for multistep Runge-Kutta methods.…”
Section: The First Class Contains the Linear Equations Y'(t) = Ly(t) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be shown that the local order reduction will not occur in case the initial value problem (1.1) is such that all partial derivatives [ai+ iJ(t, v)/8ti8J] with i,j;;:, 0, (i,j) # (0, 1), are bounded by a moderate constant (cf. [9] for a related result with Runge-Kutta methods). Note that the partial derivative with (i,j) = (0, 1), the Jacobian, is always large for stiff systems, since its norm is proportional to the Lipschitz constant.…”
Section: Local Error Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such bounds have been studied quite extensively for RungeKutta methods, for example in [8], [9] and [10]. Most Runge-Kutta methods suffer from an order reduction in the presence of stiffness, i.e., the order of convergence for stiff problems may be considerably lower than for nonstiff problems, even if the solution u(t) is very smooth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%