Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese

Abstract

In the emerging field of cross-linguistic studies on language production, one particularly interesting line of inquiry is possible differences between English and Japanese in ordering words and phrases. Previous research gives rise to the idea that there is a difference in accessing meaning versus form during linearization between these two languages. This assumption is based on observations of language-specific effects of the length factor on the order of phrases (short-before-long in English, long-before-short in Japanese). We contribute to the cross-linguistic exploration of such differences by investigating the variables underlying the internal order of NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Our quantitative analysis shows that similar influences underlie the ordering process across the two languages. Thus we do not find evidence for the aforementioned difference in accessing meaning versus form with this syntactic phenomenon. With regard to length, Japanese also exhibits a short-before-long preference. However, this tendency is significantly weaker in Japanese than in English, which we explain through an attenuating influence of the typical Japanese phrase structure pattern on the universal effect of short phrases being more accessible. We propose that a similar interaction between entrenched long-before-short schemas and universal accessibility effects is responsible for the varying effects of length in Japanese.

Proceedings of the First Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (Quasy, SyntaxFest 2019)

“…Nevertheless, it only exerts a mild effect in Chinese. This relates to previous studies, which have shown that whether the preference for DLM exists and its efficacy are dependent on the headedness of the specific structures for languages with different typological characteristics (Lohmann and Takada, 2014;. The argument status of the PP also has a pronounced effect on the orderings.…”

D-linking and the semantics of wh-in-situ

“…Experiment 1 tested the role of sortal information structure, and found that which wh-word functioned as the sortal key had a significant effect on participants' choice of position for the wh-words: sortal keys were preferred fronted. This was in the direction of Kuno's (1982) hypothesis, but the effect did not show up uniformly across wh-words, and in fact appeared as the inverse in some cases. Experiment 2 tested the hypotheses of Dayal (1996) and Willis (2008) that fronted whphrases need to have a smaller domain than their in-situ counterparts, because they are required to be exhausted over (perhaps due to being interpreted as universal quantifiers).…”

“…EXPERIMENT 1: SORTAL KEYS. The first experiment evaluates the role that discourse context plays in determining which wh-phrase is used as the 'sortal key', in the sense of Kuno (1982), and whether there is a preference for using the higher or lower wh-phrase as said key. It is a further development of an experiment piloted by Constant (2014) to test these intuitions: 'subjects... were asked to pick the best title for a list of frequently asked questions on a college admissions website.…”

“…Exactly what this asymmetry consists in is much less consistently articulated. The earliest expression of this intuition appears to be in Kuno (1982), who introduces the notion of the 'sortal key' of a multiple wh-question to mark the wh-phrase which determines the sub-questions, identifying the moved wh-phrase as the sortal key, at least in English. But what semantic content does sortality encode?…”

The range of linguistic units: Distance effects in English mandative subjunctive constructions

“…One of the major factors determining serial order is the short-beforelong principle (e.g. Behaghel 1909, Hawkins 1994, Lohmann & Takada 2014). Hawkins's (1994) performance theory relies, among other things, on the distance between the heads of phrases.…”