2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital period changes and photometric study of contact binary system AK Her

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pribulla et al (2006) quoted f ( M ) = 1.598(29), while the correct value should be 1.502(29), which can be calculated from . From Samadi et al (2010), one can calculate the value of the mass function f ( M ) = ( M 1 + M 2 )sin 3 ( i ) = 2.300 M ⊙ . This value is quite different from the spectroscopic estimate 1.502(29).…”
Section: Results and Comparison With The Literaturementioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Pribulla et al (2006) quoted f ( M ) = 1.598(29), while the correct value should be 1.502(29), which can be calculated from . From Samadi et al (2010), one can calculate the value of the mass function f ( M ) = ( M 1 + M 2 )sin 3 ( i ) = 2.300 M ⊙ . This value is quite different from the spectroscopic estimate 1.502(29).…”
Section: Results and Comparison With The Literaturementioning
confidence: 81%
“…These suggest that the system has a variable light curve and a variable period. Analysis of the updated O – C curves revealed evidence of continuously changing period with cycle length between 57 and 97 yr (Samadi et al 2010). Using the spectroscopic mass ratio of 0.26 from Sanford (1934), Samadi et al (2010) derived i (°) = 83.88 ± 0.27 and the parameters as listed in Table 9.…”
Section: Results and Comparison With The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations