2017
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital Morphometry

Abstract: This study provides the absolute limit of safe internal orbital dissection in respect to the local population. Despite males having larger orbits than females, it is clinically negligible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors wish to thank Mr Jeevan Singh Ruprai, artist and illustrator, for the original artwork (Figs. [3][4][5] presented in this review article.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors wish to thank Mr Jeevan Singh Ruprai, artist and illustrator, for the original artwork (Figs. [3][4][5] presented in this review article.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a 25% to 62% prevalence of multiple PEFs necessitating particularly careful dissection even after the main PEF has been identified. 5…”
Section: Clinical Anatomy Of the Orbital Roofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29 Both studies postulate that tight orbits and dry eye syndrome in females may account for these findings. 8,29 In general, females have smaller orbital dimensions than males, 30 and this may lead to compression of the implant against ocular tissues, thereby leading to gradual patch and conjunctival atrophy and increasing the risk of exposure. Patients with dry eye syndrome may experience repetitive microtrauma that may compromise conjunctival integrity and increase risk of exposure.…”
Section: Female Gender and Ethnicitymentioning
confidence: 99%