1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00526697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital-invariant formulation and second-order gradient evaluation in M�ller-Plesset perturbation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
326
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 521 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
326
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the approach adopted in PAO methods, [8][9][10] we eliminate the redundant vectors by canonical orthogonalization of the overlap matrix S, and truncate small eigenvalues using a threshold of 10 −6 . Although the active virtual-orbital space is doubled in size by addition of the cross excitation, it is comparable in accuracy to the case where the number of active virtual orbitals is doubled in the direct excitation ansatz.…”
Section: B Full Excitation Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the approach adopted in PAO methods, [8][9][10] we eliminate the redundant vectors by canonical orthogonalization of the overlap matrix S, and truncate small eigenvalues using a threshold of 10 −6 . Although the active virtual-orbital space is doubled in size by addition of the cross excitation, it is comparable in accuracy to the case where the number of active virtual orbitals is doubled in the direct excitation ansatz.…”
Section: B Full Excitation Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…each (localized) occupied orbital. [8][9][10] The disadvantages of using a non-orthogonal representation of the virtual space is greatly outweighed by increased locality, and the predetermination of fixed domains has made possible extremely efficient implementations in the groups of Werner and Schütz. [11][12][13][14][15] In particular, linear scaling local implementations of key methods (LMP2, 12,16,17 LCCSD, 15,18 and LCCSD(T) (Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual expressions for the energy and wave function corrections will therefore be changed. This is not a conceptual but merely a technical problem, and efficient formulations have been reported to evaluate second and higher order results with non-diagonal zero order [85][86][87]. Evaluation of the correlation energy in terms of lo-calized molecular orbitals is a typical example when such a formulation is needed.…”
Section: Møller-plesset Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an especially appealing feature as this makes it possible to perform the calculations, e.g., in terms of localized orbitals without affecting the PT formulae. This property markedly discerns the optimized partitioning from EN or MP, since the former is not orbital invariant at all, while the orbital invariant formulation of the latter [85,86] requires the use of non-diagonal resolvents. In the optimized partitioning the same second order formula (1.17) gives the same result whatever orbitals (canonical or localized) are used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has sometimes proved more computationally efficient to use a variety of definitions of MOs in order to improve the convergence of the self-consistent field ͑SCF͒ procedure [1][2][3] ͑particularly for open-shell systems͒, though at convergence each set of MOs gives the same energy. Also, localized orbitals ͑as opposed to SCF canonical orbitals͒ have been used [4][5][6] to reduce the magnitude of components contributing to certain types of correlated wave functions, such as configuration interaction ͑CI͒, coupled electron-pair approximation ͑CEPA͒, 7 and second-order Mo "ller-Plesset perturbation theory ͑MP2͒ 8 wave functions, among others. Additionally, it is well known that energy invariance can be used to simplify the construction of analytic energy gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%