Orbital effects of spatial variations of fundamental coupling constants

Abstract

We deal with the effects induced on the orbit of a test particle revolving around a central body by putative spatial variations of fundamental coupling constants $\zeta$. In particular, we assume a dipole gradient for $\zeta(\bds r)/\bar{\zeta}$ along a generic direction $\bds{\hat{k}}$ in space. We analytically work out the long-term variations of all the six standard Keplerian orbital elements parameterizing the orbit of a test particle in a gravitationally bound two-body system. It turns out that, apart from the semi-major axis $a$, the eccentricity $e$, the inclination $I$, the longitude of the ascending node $\Omega$, the longitude of pericenter $\pi$ and the mean anomaly $\mathcal{M}$ undergo non-zero long-term changes. By using the usual decomposition along the radial ($R$), transverse ($T$) and normal ($N$) directions, we also analytically work out the long-term changes $\Delta R,\Delta T,\Delta N$ and $\Delta v_R,\Delta v_T,\Delta v_N$ experienced by the position and the velocity vectors $\bds r$ and $\bds v$ of the test particle. It turns out that, apart from $\Delta N$, all the other five shifts do not vanish over one full orbital revolution. In the calculation we do not use \textit{a-priori} simplifying assumptions concerning $e$ and $I$. Thus, our results are valid for a generic orbital geometry; moreover, they hold for any gradient direction (abridged).Comment: Latex2e, 20 pages, 1 figure, 7 tables. Version accepted by Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS). Error in the caption of Table 5 corrected. References update

New Limit on Space-Time Variations in the Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio from Analysis of Quasar J110325-264515 Spectra

“…So far, this has been a motivator for astrophysical and cosmological studies beyond GR without including dark energy or dark matter, as it is used for explaining the present accelerating and expanding universe and other interesting problems in galaxies such as missing mass. It is well known that there is a highly significant indication that the temporal or spatial variations of physics constants reported have orbital effects [9,10]. Evidence for these effects motivates us to interpret other data in terms of spatial variation.…”

A phenomenological variable speed of light theory and the secular increase of the astronomical unit

“…22,23 The orbital effects of the spatial variation of fundamental constants, the possibility of measurable influences of a variable speed of light, and violation of Lorenz symmetry have also been recently studied. [24][25][26] In parallel with these advances in the high precision measurement in cosmology, there are now extremely accurate databases of measurements for the distances in the inner solar system that date back to the early 70s of the past century. After the deployment of lunar ranging retroreflectors by the Apollo missions, it became possible to send laser beams to the Moon and detect the reflected beam at Earth.…”

Constraints on the spatial variation of Planck constant

“…Dirac's argument and its implication on the Earth's evolution and temperature were discussed and constraints set onĠ/G [5,7,10]. Further experimental evidence suggested that G might present oscillations with period T G ≈ 6 yr [11] and induced new theoretical and experimental research to confirm and explain such a putative variation [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Data analyses are made difficult by the fact that, in Newton gravitation law, G is always found multiplied to the gravitational masses of the interacting bodies; but these masses are usually changing because of stellar wind and accretion from falling objects [19].…”