2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.94.155138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital-dependent Fermi surface shrinking as a fingerprint of nematicity in FeSe

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
166
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
25
166
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ARPES data for Γ 1,e /Γ 2,e from different groups [45][46][47][48] are similar but not identical. We will use recent ARPES data from Ref.…”
Section: Implications For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…ARPES data for Γ 1,e /Γ 2,e from different groups [45][46][47][48] are similar but not identical. We will use recent ARPES data from Ref.…”
Section: Implications For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We note that the larger electron pocket appears much shallower in the experiment because of the stronger renormalization of the d xy band mentioned earlier. It is also clear now that the apparently elongated ellipses can be elongated already in the tetragonal phase, mostly because the experimental Fermi level runs close to the bottoms of the electron pockets and the nematicity123467 or the orbital dependent Fermi surface shrinking5 plays secondary role.…”
Section: Breakdown Of Tetragonal Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been argued that orbital and not spin degrees of freedom are the driving force behind nematic ordering in FeSe [2,7], although perspectives that emphasise the role of magnetic fluctuations have also been suggested [8][9][10][11]. The desire to determine the magnitude and momentum-dependence of orbital ordering effects has motivated several angle-resolved photo-emission spectroscopy (ARPES) studies focusing on the evolution of the electronic structure through the nematic transition [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, a significant challenge is that FeSe samples will naturally form structural twin domains in the nematic phase, leaving some ambiguity in the interpretation of the data because both domains contribute to the measured intensity and restore fourfold symmetry macroscopically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%