1993
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90119-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital and spin M1 excitations in actinide nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22]. When applied to other rare-earth [23] and actinide [21] nuclei, this parametrization has lead to a good agreement with experimental data for single M1 transitions at low energy, observed in (e, e ′ ) and (γ, γ ′ ) experiments. The energy distribution of the spin-flip M1 strength between 6 and 10 MeV, determined by inelastic proton scattering, has also been reproduced in [21,23].…”
Section: Decoupled Isovector Interactionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[22]. When applied to other rare-earth [23] and actinide [21] nuclei, this parametrization has lead to a good agreement with experimental data for single M1 transitions at low energy, observed in (e, e ′ ) and (γ, γ ′ ) experiments. The energy distribution of the spin-flip M1 strength between 6 and 10 MeV, determined by inelastic proton scattering, has also been reproduced in [21,23].…”
Section: Decoupled Isovector Interactionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A large overlap of a given RPA state with its synthetic counterpart is an indication for an isovector rotational motion, irrespectively of the low collectivity caused by the fragmentation. The strongest (low-energy orbital) M1 excitation overlaps usually 80-90% with its synthetic counterpart [2,21]. In contrast, no one of the strongest orbital states at high energy (around 22 MeV in the upper plot of Fig. 2) overlaps more than 7% with its synthetic counterpart.…”
Section: High-energy M1 Strength and (E E ′ ) Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To calculate the total partition function Z we use the macroscopic-microscopic nuclear level density of [2]. The average occupancy f is computed from BCS occupation numbers based on single particle levels from an axially symmetric deformed Saxon-Woods potential [3] with parameters from [4] which reproduce experimental data well [5,6]. All major shells up to 11hω were included which allows to extend our calculations way beyond the previously studied pf +g 9/2 shell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isospin dependence of this parametrization allows one to extend it to any mass region. Previous QRPA calculations have shown that it provides a realistic description of the ground-state properties of deformed nuclei as well as good results on M1 excitations [17] for nuclei in various mass regions. The quadrupole deformation of the WS potential is determined by fitting the microscopically calculated quadrupole moment to the corresponding experimental value.…”
Section: Brief Description Of the Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%