2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271819400066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbit design and thruster requirement for various constant arm space mission concepts for gravitational-wave observation

Abstract: In previous papers, we have addressed the issues of orbit design and thruster requirement for the constant arm versions of AMIGO (Astrodynamical Middle-frequency Interferometric Gravitational-wave Observatory) mission concept and for the constant arm GW (gravitational wave) mission concept of AIGSO (Atom Interferometric Gravitationalwave Space Observatory). In this paper, we apply similar methods to the orbit design and thruster requirement for the constant arm GW missions B-DECIGO and DECIGO, and estimate the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could also rescale to the recently proposed TianGO GW mission [47] whether it adopted constant arm or not. In accompanying papers, we also study the orbit formations for AIGSO [48,49] and the constant equal-arm orbit options for LISA and TAIJI [50].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could also rescale to the recently proposed TianGO GW mission [47] whether it adopted constant arm or not. In accompanying papers, we also study the orbit formations for AIGSO [48,49] and the constant equal-arm orbit options for LISA and TAIJI [50].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous works [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80], we developed a workflow to design and optimize the orbits for GW space missions by using an ephemeris framework in the solar system barycentric (SSB) coordinates, as well as to calculate the path mismatches between the TDI laser beams. Based on the orbital requirements for new LISA [40], we achieved the numerical orbit for 6 years satisfying the criteria: 1) the relative velocities between S/C are smaller than 5m/s; 2) the changes of breathing angles are less than 1 deg, and 3) the trailing angle is in a range [19°, 23°] [79].…”
Section: Numerical Mission Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative time t rel would differ from starting t rel = 0 due to the relative motion between the S/C during TDI which is the path mismatch δt. In previous works [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], we implemented this algorithm to calculate the path mismatch for laser frequency noise suppression and verify the feasibility of the TDI configurations. Another purpose of the calculation is to determine time delay in each link and the S/C positions, since the response to a GW signal will depend on the time delay factors and instantaneous positions of the S/C, and the noises in the TDI channels are related to the time delay.…”
Section: Numerical Algorithm For Tdi Calculation a Algorithm For Tdi ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a numerical algorithm to calculate the path mismatches in the TDI for LISA-like missions and ASTROD-GW concept since 2011 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. In previous paper [46], by using a set of numerical orbit, we investigated the GW response, noise level and averaged sensitivity of the optimal channels (A, E, and T) constructed from the first-generation Michelson TDI channels (X, Y, and Z) for LISA and TAIJI missions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%