2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: BackgroundIntravenous glucocorticoids are recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, they can be inconvenient and expensive. Due to their convenience and low cost, oral glucocorticoids may be an alternative treatment. Recently, several studies have shown that there is no difference in efficacy and safety between oral methylprednisolone (oMP) and intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP).ObjectivesWe sought to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral methylprednisolone versus intravenous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Corticosteroids (CS), including self-administered oral CS (OCS) and provider-administered intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), are first-line MS relapse treatments with purportedly similar efficacy [3, 6, 7]. Treatment with IVMP requires multiple infusions, which can be more costly and less convenient than OCS and may impact daily life [6, 7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corticosteroids (CS), including self-administered oral CS (OCS) and provider-administered intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), are first-line MS relapse treatments with purportedly similar efficacy [3, 6, 7]. Treatment with IVMP requires multiple infusions, which can be more costly and less convenient than OCS and may impact daily life [6, 7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corticosteroids (CS), including self-administered oral CS (OCS) and provider-administered intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), are first-line MS relapse treatments with purportedly similar efficacy [3, 6, 7]. Treatment with IVMP requires multiple infusions, which can be more costly and less convenient than OCS and may impact daily life [6, 7]. Given the majority of clinical studies for the treatment of MS relapse [816] were conducted before the widespread availability and diversification of disease-modifying therapy (DMT), updated effectiveness information is lacking [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We administrated MPS-NPMOF via intravitreous injection. It avoided the lower efficiency and adverse effects caused by systemic administration and prolonged the retention time of the drug 36,37. That’s why retinas revealed smaller scale of lesioned site, milder injury and faster recovery following MPS-NPMOF injection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current first-line treatments for MS relapse exacerbations include corticosteroids (CS) that may be prescribed to patients to be taken orally or administered intravenously in a clinical setting. Intravenous administration of CS requires multiple infusions and, in addition to interfering with a patient's daily life, is more costly than oral CS [6][7][8]. In both cases, high doses of CS are accompanied by a number of adverse effects that may not be tolerated well among MS patients [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%