2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral shedding of Bartonella in cats: Correlation with bacteremia and seropositivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, 39.9% of cats tested positive for Bartonella DNA, which is higher than those found in previous reports, including those that address cats from shelters. 13,15,[24][25][26] Similar results were reported in California, United States. 26 Notably, it was found that 97.3% of cats harbored bacterial DNA in a shelter in Volta Redonda municipality, Rio de Janeiro, which is attributable to local conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, 39.9% of cats tested positive for Bartonella DNA, which is higher than those found in previous reports, including those that address cats from shelters. 13,15,[24][25][26] Similar results were reported in California, United States. 26 Notably, it was found that 97.3% of cats harbored bacterial DNA in a shelter in Volta Redonda municipality, Rio de Janeiro, which is attributable to local conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…13,15,[24][25][26] Similar results were reported in California, United States. 26 Notably, it was found that 97.3% of cats harbored bacterial DNA in a shelter in Volta Redonda municipality, Rio de Janeiro, which is attributable to local conditions. 27 Bartonella infection was significantly higher in cats from group 2 when than in those from group 1 (Rio de Janeiro municipality), which may be explained by differences in hygiene conditions and preventive flea control applied in these shelters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The route of infection is unknown, although direct conjunctival inoculation, most likely with infected flea feces, seems to be most plausible [149]. Knowing, however, that B. henselae is present in up to 40% of cat saliva [150], it is more plausible that salivary fluid could be rubbed directly into the eye from the skin after been licked by a cat. There are several anecdotal reports of infections in mainly young children that were transmitted by being licked.…”
Section: Licking the Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct transmission between mammal hosts has occasionally been reported, e.g., via cat bites (57), and the release of Bartonella into the saliva of infected cats has been demonstrated (311).…”
Section: Host Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%