2003
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/28.1.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Shear Stress Predicts Flavour Perception in Viscous Solutions

Abstract: The perception of sweetness and flavour were studied in viscous solutions containing 50 g/l sucrose, 100 p.p.m. iso-amyl acetate and varying concentrations of three hydrocolloid thickeners (guar gum, lambda-carrageenan and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose). Zero-shear viscosity of the samples ranged from 1 to 5000 mPas. Perception of both sweetness and aroma was suppressed at thickener concentrations above c* (coil overlap concentration, the point at which there is an abrupt increase in solution viscosity as thic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4c, d). The good correlation obtained between the two index values (R 2 = 0.92) seems to confirm the practical utility of both of these instrumental measurements to predict perceived consistency or thickness in this type of semisolid product (Cook et al 2003;Arancibia et al 2013b).…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4c, d). The good correlation obtained between the two index values (R 2 = 0.92) seems to confirm the practical utility of both of these instrumental measurements to predict perceived consistency or thickness in this type of semisolid product (Cook et al 2003;Arancibia et al 2013b).…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, some authors have found that oral thickness correlates with different rheological indices. It has been confirmed that one of them, apparent viscosity at a shear rate of 50 s −1 , suggested by Wood in 1968, has practical utility as a possible instrumental index of thickness perceived in semisolid foods (Cook et al 2003;Arancibia et al 2013b). Consequently, apparent viscosity values at a shear rate of 50 s −1 (η 50 ) were also calculated.…”
Section: Flow Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cook [21] looked at the effect of physical properties on retronasal flavour release and showed that the viscosity of a consumed solution did not affect retronasal flavour delivery. Cook hypothesized, within the study, that it was the interfacial properties of the solution that are most significant in controlling flavour concentration retronasally.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Headspace Volatile Concentration During Dynamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comprehensive study, Cook et al (2003) investigated the relationship between various viscosity-related parameters and taste perception and found the strongest dependence on the Kokini oral shear stress defined by Equation 8.1. Of course, a viscosity dependence of perception must result from the relationship shown in Fig.…”
Section: Rheology and Flavour Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%