1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-004703-1.50016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Self-Administration and the Relevance of Conditioned Taste Aversions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This e¤ect has been interpreted as a result of aversive post-ingestional e¤ects of the drug (Stolerman et al 1971). Indeed, several studies have shown that d-amphetamine and related compounds can produce both unconditioned and conditioned taste aversion (Sanger et al 1974;Booth et al 1977;Stolerman and DMello 1981;Lin et al 1993). Thus, the decline in voluntary intake of d-amphetamine might be due to a developing conditioned or unconditioned taste aversion produced by the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This e¤ect has been interpreted as a result of aversive post-ingestional e¤ects of the drug (Stolerman et al 1971). Indeed, several studies have shown that d-amphetamine and related compounds can produce both unconditioned and conditioned taste aversion (Sanger et al 1974;Booth et al 1977;Stolerman and DMello 1981;Lin et al 1993). Thus, the decline in voluntary intake of d-amphetamine might be due to a developing conditioned or unconditioned taste aversion produced by the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A threshold dose of nicotine induced CTAs in three groups pre-treated with bupropion, but these did not vary from the control group. The interpretation of conditioned taste aversions produced by psychoactive drugs is controversial because such effects may reflect positive conditioned suppression and may be more closely related to the rewarding than to the aversive properties of the substance (Stolerman and D'Mello 1981;Grigson 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDPV has been shown to have both aversive and rewarding effects (King et al , 2014, 2015, Merluzzi et al , 2014), and in order to determine how these affective properties contribute to MDPV’s relative abuse potential, it is critical to examine factors that might influence the balance between them (Gaiardi et al , 1991, Riley, 2011, Stolerman and D’Mello, 1981, Verendeev and Riley, 2013). Sex is of particular interest here, because while the data regarding the influence of sex on avoidance and reward are mixed (see above), work with a number of stimulants has demonstrated that, in general, females may be more likely to abuse these drugs (Lynch et al , 2002, Russo et al , 2003, Zakharova et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that drug self-administration is often described as the result of a balance between the aversive and rewarding effects of a drug (see Riley, 2011, Stolerman and D’Mello, 1981, Verendeev and Riley, 2013), it is important to examine each of these effects in order to determine any factors that may influence them and, thus, their impact on abuse. In one such examination of the aversive effects of MDPV, Merluzzi et al (2014) used a range of doses (1, 1.8 and 3.2 mg/kg) to assess taste avoidance conditioning in male Sprague-Dawley rats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%