2020
DOI: 10.1111/flan.12484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral proficiency levels of first‐year entering college students with and without Advanced Placement scores

Abstract: The Challenge Considerable professional discussion revolves around integrating K-16 curricula. Do we understand the oral proficiency levels of entering college students? Do they match the expectations of college courses? What do we know about the proficiency levels of students entering college from enhanced curricula, particularly Advanced Placement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), as this has implications for placement; Empirically exploring the use of standardized tests not as tools to help define comparable achievement/equivalencies across secondary and postsecondary programs (i.e., is a 4 on the AP Chinese Language exam actually equivalent to university student learning in a second‐ or third‐semester Chinese course? See Bernhardt & Leffell, 2020, for a recent example of an empirical investigation of this issue).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), as this has implications for placement; Empirically exploring the use of standardized tests not as tools to help define comparable achievement/equivalencies across secondary and postsecondary programs (i.e., is a 4 on the AP Chinese Language exam actually equivalent to university student learning in a second‐ or third‐semester Chinese course? See Bernhardt & Leffell, 2020, for a recent example of an empirical investigation of this issue).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%