2012
DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.s2-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Nicotine Self-Administration in Rodents

Abstract: Nicotine addiction is a complex process that begins with self-administration. Consequently, this process has been studied extensively using animal models. A person is usually not called “smoker” if s/he has smoked for a week or a month in a lifetime; in general, a smoker has been smoking for many years. Furthermore, a smoker has free access to cigarettes and can smoke whenever she/he wants, provided there are no social/legal restraints. Subsequently, in an animal model of tobacco addiction, it will be desirabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the intravenous self-administration paradigm, this approach allowed us to overcome the challenges associated with the small size of young mice and the need for prolonged catheter patency. Despite resulting in slower pharmacokinetics compared to intravenous nicotine selfadministration, the 2BC model produces an expected inverted U-shape dose-response curve for nicotine and leads to symptoms of withdrawal when nicotine is withheld (Bagdas et al, 2019;Pogun and C Collins, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the intravenous self-administration paradigm, this approach allowed us to overcome the challenges associated with the small size of young mice and the need for prolonged catheter patency. Despite resulting in slower pharmacokinetics compared to intravenous nicotine selfadministration, the 2BC model produces an expected inverted U-shape dose-response curve for nicotine and leads to symptoms of withdrawal when nicotine is withheld (Bagdas et al, 2019;Pogun and C Collins, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, alternating the position of liquids in the two sipper tubes across time may be needed to control for this bias in preference assays. Second, the device currently requires animals to be singly housed, which may limit how many experiments can be run simultaneously due to space constraints and could introduce stress that may affect behavioral assays (Collins et al, 2012; Kamakura et al, 2016). However, as the device is open source, it could be modified to include additional sensors for discriminating multiple animals, such as RFID (radio-frequency identification) sensors that have been used in some commercial systems for this purpose (Galsworthy et al, 2005; Bains et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Cre(+) mice showed greater nicotine intake (significant at the highest concentration offered) but did not demonstrate nicotine CPP at the selected nicotine dose of 0.25 mg/kg. The assays differ with respect to controllability of drug exposure, route of drug administration, kinetics of nicotine exposure, number of nicotine exposures, and variability of nicotine dosage [ 45 ]. Oral self-administration assays are frequently used to assess the motivational effects of abused drugs and have the advantage of allowing the animal to control their own intake of the drug, thereby providing a relatively direct index of its reinforcing value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%