The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2024
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13030195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Microbiome Stamp in Alzheimer’s Disease

Argul Issilbayeva,
Aiym Kaiyrlykyzy,
Elizaveta Vinogradova
et al.

Abstract: Recent studies have suggested that periodontal disease and alterations in the oral microbiome may be associated with cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) development. Here, we report a case-control study of oral microbiota diversity in AD patients compared to healthy seniors from Central Asia. We have characterized the bacterial taxonomic composition of the oral microbiome from AD patients (n = 64) compared to the healthy group (n = 71) using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. According to our results, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spearman’s r correlation coefficient, adjusted for FDR, identified taxonomic features significantly related to ordination results. Differential analysis of taxonomic features was determined using “LEfSe 1.0.8”, applying a significance criterion of LDA > 2, p ≤ 0.05, consistent with methods reported by Issilbayeva et al (2024) . Differential analysis of functional features was based on differences in medians with 95 CI estimation using the Hodlges-Leghman estimator, considering only those with non-overlapping intervals as significant, following the methods described by Kozhakhmetov et al (2023) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spearman’s r correlation coefficient, adjusted for FDR, identified taxonomic features significantly related to ordination results. Differential analysis of taxonomic features was determined using “LEfSe 1.0.8”, applying a significance criterion of LDA > 2, p ≤ 0.05, consistent with methods reported by Issilbayeva et al (2024) . Differential analysis of functional features was based on differences in medians with 95 CI estimation using the Hodlges-Leghman estimator, considering only those with non-overlapping intervals as significant, following the methods described by Kozhakhmetov et al (2023) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%