2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral lipid nanomedicines: Current status and future perspectives in cancer treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Orally administered nanomedicines generally have low BA due to two barriers, mucus penetration and transepithelial transport. [ 2b,7b ] To tackle these barriers, the difficulty is that the requirements on the nanomedicine surface for efficient mucus penetration and transepithelial transport are opposite; that is, stealthy or nonfouling surface favors mucus penetration but hampers cellular uptake and transcytosis. [ 8 ] For instance, PEG‐based micelles are efficient in mucus penetration, [ 25 ] as shown in Figure 4a, but hardly taken up by villus cells (Figure 5a) and thus poor in intestinal absorption (Figure 4d,e) and BA (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Orally administered nanomedicines generally have low BA due to two barriers, mucus penetration and transepithelial transport. [ 2b,7b ] To tackle these barriers, the difficulty is that the requirements on the nanomedicine surface for efficient mucus penetration and transepithelial transport are opposite; that is, stealthy or nonfouling surface favors mucus penetration but hampers cellular uptake and transcytosis. [ 8 ] For instance, PEG‐based micelles are efficient in mucus penetration, [ 25 ] as shown in Figure 4a, but hardly taken up by villus cells (Figure 5a) and thus poor in intestinal absorption (Figure 4d,e) and BA (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, anticancer nanomedicines are generally limited to intravenous administration. [ 1 ] Given extensive research on oral nanomedicine, [ 2 ] there is no product clinically approved yet [ 2b,3 ] because orally administered nanomedicines typically suffer from very low BA and thus low efficacy. [ 3b,4 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 19 , 20 Oral route can be utilised to target a specific location in the GIT following proper design of the drug or the delivery carrier. 21 Several studies utilised oral route to target CRC throughout the rational design of cancer target discovery and development (CTDD). 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral administration of drugs is preferred in human and veterinary medicine thanks to many practical benefits as high compliance, better disease management, reduced costs, easy of distribution and selling in the markets [1]. However, this route o administration is often not possible due to plethora of drawbacks related to drugs stability and degradability, besides toxicity and poor bioavailability [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%